Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Donald Lewis Brooks, Jr. - California Death Row

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,534

    Donald Lewis Brooks, Jr. - California Death Row




    Facts of the Crime:

    Sentenced to death in Los Angeles County on July 16, 2001 for the March 24, 1999 murder of his ex-girlfriend Lisa Kerr of Van Nuys. Brooks abused Kerr during their relationship and then stalked her after she called it off. He then left her body in the back seat of her burning car near the Roscoe Boulevard exit of the Hollywood Freeway. Brooks then escaped to Colorado Springs where he was captured on July 23, 1999 after his profile and picture was aired on a local television station.

  2. #2
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Brooks' case has been fully briefed on direct appeal before the California Supreme Court since March 12, 2012.

    http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.g...doc_no=S099274

  3. #3
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On January 4, 2017, oral argument will be heard in Brooks' direct appeal before the California Supreme Court.

    http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/c...s/SJAN417A.PDF

  4. #4
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    THE PEOPLE v DONALD LEWIS BROOKS

    Court: California Supreme Court

    Opinion Date: March 20, 2017

    After a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. The jury found true special-circumstance allegations. After a penalty phase, the jury returned a verdict of death.The trial court denied Defendant’s motion for modification of his sentence to life without the possibility of parole. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) no prejudicial error occurred during the pretrial phase of trial or during the guilt phase of trial; (2) substantial evidence supported Defendant’s convictions; (3) no prejudicial error occurred during the penalty phase of trial; and (4) Defendant’s challenges to the constitutionality of California’s death penalty scheme were unavailing.
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  5. #5
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On March 20, 2017, Brooks filed a habeas petition before the California Supreme Court.

    https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca....NRICAgCg%3D%3D

  6. #6
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Former Plumber Who Killed Ex-Girlfriend

    The state Supreme Court yesterday affirmed the death sentence for a former Van Nuys plumber who killed his ex-girlfriend after she told him she was reconciling with her husband.

    The justices unanimously upheld the conviction of Donald Lewis Brooks Jr. for the killing of Lisa Kerr, which jurors found to be accompanied by special circumstances of torture and kidnapping. Six justices voted to affirm in full, while one argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the kidnapping special circumstance, but voted to uphold the death sentence based on the torture special circumstance alone.

    Prosecutors said Brooks tried to strangle the Van Nuys woman and then put her in the back of a car, setting it on fire on the side of a freeway in Arleta in March 1999. The two had met in Alcoholics Anonymous, and Brooks told a fellow member, who testified for the prosecution, that he was in love with Kerr and that their relationship was perfect.

    He also told the witness that he was upset at the possibility of Kerr, who separated from her husband after meeting Brooks, going back to her husband, with whom she had a young child. He said he wanted to stab the husband or “get him out of the picture,” the witness testified.

    The defense did not challenge the evidence that Brooks killed Kerr, but said he acted in the heat of passion.

    In the penalty phase, the prosecution presented evidence that Brooks had committed several acts of violence against his ex-wife during their three-year marriage, along with victim-impact testimony. The defense countered with witnesses who said Brooks had survived a childhood characterized by alcohol abuse and domestic violence, and was a kind and caring person and loving father of three.

    Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Warren Greene, now deceased, imposed sentence based on the jury’s death penalty verdict, calling the crime heinous" and "reprehensible in every respect,” according to a newspaper account.

    Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote yesterday’s majority opinion. She agreed with the attorney general that there was enough circumstantial evidence for jurors to conclude that Kerr was taken from her residence with criminal intent separate from that required to convict Brooks of murder, thus supporting the kidnapping special circumstance, which the court had asked counsel to focus on at oral argument.

    “Here, the record discloses substantial evidence from which a jury could reasonably infer that defendant had not yet decided Kerr’s fate after incapacitating her and moving her into the back of her own car,” the chief justice wrote. She cited evidence of a three-hour time gap between the time Kerr left a friend’s house and the discovery of her body by firefighters, even though Brooks’s plumber’s assistant testified that Brooks told him he had confronted her right after she left her friend’s house and strangled her into unconsciousness.

    Jurors could also infer from the complicated nature of the couple’s relationship “that defendant was conflicted regarding what to do with Kerr after he strangled her.”

    Cantil-Sakauye was joined in the opinion by Justices Ming Chin, Carol Corrigan, Kathryn M. Werdegar, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, and Leondra Kruger.

    Justice Goodwin H. Liu, dissented as to the kidnapping special circumstance only. The suggestion that “Brooks was in a ‘state of panic’ or unsure about Kerr’s fate when he drove away, or that he some additional motive in transporting her unconscious body,” is not consistent with the case argued by the prosecutor—then-Deputy District Attorney Scott Gordon, now a Los Angeles Superior Court judge—at trial, Liu argued.

    The case was argued in the Supreme Court by San Diego attorney John L. Staley for the defense and Deputy Attorney General Allison H. Chung of Los Angeles for the prosecution.

    The case is People v. Brooks, S099274.

    http://www.metnews.com/articles/2017/brook032117.htm

  7. #7
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    In today's decisions, the California Supreme Court DENIED Brooks' petition for rehearing.

    http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/do...s/S099274M.PDF

  8. #8
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    In today's United States Supreme Court orders, Brooks' petition for writ of certiorari was DENIED on direct appeal.

    Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
    Case Numbers: (S099274)
    Decision Date: May 31, 2017
    Rehearing Denied: July 12, 2017

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....c/17-6237.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •