The agreement with safety is critical, in most states to be sentenced to death you have to be found as a future danger.
Are you a habitual criminal? Have you continual stalked and harassed someone for years? Yes? You are a danger. Which means that this sentence isn't arbitrary and you are different. A special case.
We had a death row murder earlier this year, what are we suppose to do with that guy at that point? We can't throw him in solitary for the rest of his life that's unconstitutional. We also can't keep him prison for a life sentence because that's also unconstitutional.
Without a criteria to separate these people from other murderers than we just go back onto the complete arbitrarily nature of the death penalty which is the legal reason as to why it was striken down in the first place.
I believe this is the second post from you regrading we need to continue to give ground to these people for better optics. Which again we aren't winning any debates anyway. Because they aren't debating us, they aren't putting the DP on referendums. They are having civil servants refusing to carry out the law and sending issuing stays for just about any reason they can, even when they know the higher court will give em a slap when they get it.
What's going on big guy you okay?
Bookmarks