izmir escort izmir escort antalya escort porno jigolo izmir escort bursa escort instagram hesap kapatma takipçi hilesi havalandırma sistemleri porno izle takipçi satışı saha betonu leadersmm.com youtube haberleri alsancak escort bursa escort bursa escort gaziantep escort denizli escort izmir escort istanbul escort istanbul escort istanbul escort izmir escort
Former Green Beret Maj. Matthew Golsteyn faces murder charge for 2010 Afghanistan incident
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Former Green Beret Maj. Matthew Golsteyn faces murder charge for 2010 Afghanistan incident

  1. #1
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010

    Former Green Beret Maj. Matthew Golsteyn faces murder charge for 2010 Afghanistan incident

    Maj. Matthew Golsteyn is pictured here as a captain during his 2011 Silver Star Medal ceremony at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

    After eight years, two investigations and the intervention of a congressman, Maj. Matthew Golsteyn is being charged with murder in the death of an Afghan man during a 2010 deployment.

    Golsteyns commander has determined that sufficient evidence exists to warrant the preferral of charges against him, U.S. Army Special Operations Command spokesman Lt. Col. Loren Bymer told Army Times in a brief email statement Thursday.

    Major Golsteyn is being charged with the murder of an Afghan male during his 2010 deployment to Afghanistan, Bymer wrote.

    The majors attorney, Phillip Stackhouse, told Army Times that he and his client learned of the charges on Thursday as well, and that the murder charge carries with it the possibility of a death penalty.

    Stackhouse called his client a humble servant-leader who saved countless lives, both American and Afghan, and has been recognized repeatedly for his valorous actions.

    Bymer confirmed that Golsteyn has been recalled to active duty and is under the command of the USASOC headquarters company. An intermediary commander will review the warrant of preferred charges to determine if the major will face an Article 32 hearing that could lead to a court-martial.

    That commander has 120 days to make that decision.

    Golsteyn had been placed on voluntary excess leave, an administrative status for soldiers pending lengthy administrative proceedings, Bymer said. He is not being confined at this time.

    The path to these charges has been a winding one.

    Golsteyn, a captain at the time, was deployed to Afghanistan in 2010 with 3rd Special Forces Group. During the intense Battle of Marja, explosives planted on a booby-trapped door killed two Marines and wounded three others who were working with the majors unit.

    During those heated days, Golsteyn earned a Silver Star, the nations third-highest award for valor, when he helped track down a sniper targeting his troops, assisted a wounded Afghan soldier and helped coordinate multiple airstrikes.

    He would be awarded that medal at a 2011 ceremony at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The award was later approved for an upgrade to the Distinguished Service Cross, the second highest award for valor.

    But both the medal and his coveted Special Forces tab would be stripped from him due to an investigation that eventually closed in 2014 without any charges.

    An Army board of inquiry recommended a general discharge for Golsteyn and found no clear evidence the soldier violated the rules of engagement while deployed in 2010. This would have allowed Golsteyn to retain most of his retirement benefits under a recommended general discharge under honorable conditions.

    Though he was cleared of a law of armed conflict violation, the board found Golsteyns conduct as unbecoming an officer.

    Golsteyn was out of Special Forces and in a legal limbo as he awaited a discharge.

    That could have been the end of it, but in mid-2015, Army documents surfaced, showing that Golsteyn allegedly told CIA interviewers during a polygraph test that he had killed an alleged Afghan bomb-maker and later conspired with others to destroy the body.

    Those documents were part of a 2011 report filed by an Army investigator, Special Agent Zachary Jackson, who reported that Golsteyn said after the Marines were killed in the February blast that his unit found bomb-making materials nearby, detained the suspected bomb-maker and brought him back to their base.

    A local tribal leader identified the man as a known Taliban bomb-maker. The accused learned of the leaders identification, which caused the tribal leader to fear he would kill him and his family if released.

    Trusting the leader and having also seen other detainees released, Golsteyn allegedly told CIA interviewers that he and another soldier took the alleged bomb-maker off base, shot him and buried his remains.

    He also allegedly told the interviewers that on the night of the killing, he and two other soldiers dug up the body and burned it in a trash pit on base.

    Stackhouse has previously called this alleged admission a fantasy that his client confessed to shooting an unarmed man.

    Then, in late 2016, during an interview with Fox News, Golsteyn admitted to a version of the incidents involving the killing of the alleged Afghan bomb-maker.

    The Army opened a second investigation near the end of 2016.

    Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California, himself a Marine veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, stepped in on Golsteyns behalf, writing a letter to the Army secretary and making scathing public comments about the case, calling the Armys investigation retaliatory and vindictive.

    The congressman called on Army leadership to fix this stupidity, describing Golsteyn as a distinguished and well regarded Green Beret.

    Unrelated to the Golsteyn case, Hunter was indicted earlier this year by federal prosecutors who are alleging conspiracy, wire fraud, falsification of records and prohibited use of campaign contributions.

    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  2. #2
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Green Beret's attorney welcomes Trump offer to review murder case

    The attorney for a former Green Beret charged with murder in the death of a suspected Taliban bomb maker in Afghanistan in 2010 welcomed President Donald Trump's tweet that he will review his client's case.

    But the sympathetic desire to review Maj. Mathew Golsteyn's case has military legal experts questioning whether Trump may be exerting "unlawful command influence" in the case by interfering in the legal process before Golsteyn has even had a court hearing.

    Last week, Golsteyn was charged with premeditated murder in February 2010 of an Afghan man suspected of having been a Taliban bomb maker responsible for the deaths of two Marines.

    On Sunday, Trump tweeted, "At the request of many, I will be reviewing the case of a 'U.S. Military hero,' Major Matt Golsteyn, who is charged with murder."

    Donald J. Trump

    At the request of many, I will be reviewing the case of a “U.S. Military hero,” Major Matt Golsteyn, who is charged with murder. He could face the death penalty from our own government after he admitted to killing a Terrorist bomb maker while overseas. @PeteHegseth @FoxNews


    10:03 AM - Dec 16, 2018
    Twitter Ads info and privacy

    38.4K people are talking about this

    "We are very appreciative that he's going to take a look at it and hopeful that he would take action to resolve this issue for Matt," Golsteyn's attorney Phillip Stackhouse told ABC News in a phone interview Monday.

    Asked on Monday to comment about the president's tweet, the White House referred back to the social media post and declined to provide any additional comment. A spokesman told ABC News that the White House does not traditionally comment on cases that may be under consideration for clemency and pardon.

    "The allegations against Maj. Matt Golsteyn are a law enforcement matter," said Col. Rob Manning, a Pentagon spokesman. "The Department of Defense will respect the integrity of this process and provide updates when appropriate."

    But Trump's possible review is problematic, according to a prominent military legal expert.

    "The president's tweet is extremely troubling because it's it's touching the third rail of military justice," Eugene Fidell told ABC News. "It's commonly said that unlawful command influence is the mortal enemy of military justice."

    Fidell, a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School, has served as an attorney in several high-profile military cases. He was most recently an attorney for Bowe Bergdahl, a former soldier who was held by the Taliban for five years and last year pleaded guilty to desertion and misbehavior before the enemy.

    Fidell described Trump's sympathetic offer to review the case as "a distortion of the administration of justice even if it's for the benefit of the accused in a particular case."

    The Army has not announced any dates for the initial court hearings that will determine whether Golsteyn will face a court martial. His attorney, Stackhouse, estimates the Article 32 hearings, as they are known by the military, may not be held until next spring.

    That's one reason why Fidell thinks the possibility that the president could offer Golsteyn a pardon should wait until the military justice system has had a chance to determine all the facts in his case.

    "Until there's a proper, on the record, public investigation and ventilation of the facts of the case it would be very unfortunate for him to do that," said Fidell.

    There are different narratives about what happened when the Afghan man died on Feb. 18, 2010. What is not in dispute is that the investigations were prompted by Golsteyn's own comments.

    The Army’s initial investigation was triggered in late 2011 by Golsteyn's acknowledgement during a CIA job interview that he had killed the suspected Taliban bomb maker.

    Golsteyn had told the CIA that he had killed the man out of concerns for the safety of the tribal leader and that he could have posed a future threat to U.S. troops, according to Army documents.

    That investigation did not result in any charges being filed against Golsteyn, even though investigators determined he had committed murder and conspiracy.

    He eventually lost his Special Forces tab and a Silver Star for heroism in a battle two days after the Afghan man's death.

    Then in late 2016, a new investigation was triggered after Golsteyn admitted in a Fox News interview that he had killed the man.

    The Army's narrative of events, as laid out in documents obtained by the Washington Post in 2015 under the Freedom of Information Act, is that Golsteyn and his team detained the man after finding explosive materials at his home that were similar to those used in the bomb that killed the two Marines.

    Taking the man to his home after a 24-hour detention, Golsteyn allegedly killed the man there and buried him in a shallow grave, Army documents said. Later that night, Golsteyn and two other soldiers dug up the remains and brought them back to their base where they burned his remains in a burn pit.

    According to Golsteyn’s lawyer, that’s not what happened. Stackhouse told ABC News that after having been released, the suspected bomb maker was not killed at his home. He said the man was killed along a road in southern Marjah, after he carried out an ambush against Golsteyn’s troops. He acknowledged that Golsteyn disposed of the body, but he could not say how.

    Stackhouse claims that the initial 2011 Army Criminal Investigations Command (CID) narrative has been wrong from the start beginning with the CIA’s characterization of Golsteyn’s comments.

    “It’s just that CID put the wrong information in the investigation and repeated it over and over again,” said Stackhouse.

    In an interview with Fox News on Monday, his wife Julie said that her husband was cleared of wrongdoing in 2015.

    "We have moved on with our lives," she said. "We moved, had a new baby, we have moved on. We are waiting for someone to do the right thing."

    Golsteyn was put on "voluntary excess leave" in August 2016 which is a non-paid status used for soldiers experiencing long-term administration issues who can't be formally discharged from service.

    But he reported back on active duty in early December as the Army worked to finalize the ongoing investigation.

    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts