But what did you make of Pruett's evidence? Damning is it not?
Well I've never been a fan of McDonald, too light weight in my opinion.
Well it would seem that the state has no evidence, except dodgy snitch evidence and a ripped up charge sheet, that one of the investigates said, as I para-phase, 'we went with that', weak very weak, who had access to that sheet? Where did it come from? Why was there 'no' DNA evidence on it? Oh, and there was no DNA evidence on Pruett from the CO's blood, which was in evidence in large qualities. And he was just in denial another one said, well if he hadn't done it he would deny it would he? Just like when they found a witch, throw her in a pond and if she floats, she must be a witch so kill her, if she sinks and dies, then she wasn't a witch but she dies anyhow.I'd like to see the briefs that the clinic working for him are filing on his behalf, and how they allege they can prove [even just the possibility of] an alternative version of events. As well as the complete prosecution case against him.
Convenient, seen as you have nothing to go on! And Garza most likely was involved, but was he the trigger man?. There is that 'law of parties' again. a catch all position to save on actual investigations, in my opinion!*Off Topic from now on*
Bookmarks