Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Johnny O'Landis Bennett, Jr. - South Carolina

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,534

    Johnny O'Landis Bennett, Jr. - South Carolina




    Summary of Offense:

    Convicted of the November 27, 1990 murder of 24-year-old Benton Smith, who was stabbed 75 times with a screwdriver.

    Bennett was sentenced to death on November 19, 1995 in Lexington County.

  2. #2
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On June 26, 2006, the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld Bennett's death sentence on direct appeal.

    On November 27, 2006, the US Supreme Court denied Bennett's certiorari petition.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...es/06-6780.htm

    On September 7, 2006, Bennett filed an application for post-conviction relief in Lexington County Circuit Court.

    On April 3, 2009, Bennett's application was denied.

    http://cms.lex-co.com/scjdweb/public...rstName=Johnny

  3. #3
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On November 14, 2013, Bennett filed a habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    https://dockets.justia.com/docket/so...cv03191/206140

    On March 16, 2016, Bennett's petition was GRANTED and his death sentence VACATED.

    https://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...191/206140/108

  4. #4
    Moderator Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Newport, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,454
    A Judge Overturned a Death Sentence Because the Prosecutor Compared a Black Defendant to King Kong

    By Andrew Cohen
    The Marshall Project

    The South Carolina prosecutor is known as ‘Death Penalty Donnie.’

    A federal trial judge in South Carolina last week overturned the death sentence of a man convicted of stabbing his victim more than 70 times with a screwdriver. The sentencing phase of the trial of Johnny O’Landis Bennett was so infected by racial animus by the prosecutor and a juror, U.S. District Judge Richard Mark Gergel concluded, that Bennett was deprived of his constitutional right to due process.

    The granting of habeas relief is a rare thing these days, but Judge Gergel’s order in the Bennett case is remarkable for two other reasons. First, it highlights the lack of meaningful judicial review capital cases like this receive from state judges in South Carolina, jurists who time and again in Bennett’s case excused the racist theme of the hearing. Second, the judicial rebuke marks a fitting epitaph for the professional career of Donald V. Myers, a legal legend in that neck of the woods.

    Myers, also known as “Doctor Death” and “Death Penalty Donnie,” sent 28 people to death row in South Carolina during his decades as the state’s most flamboyant prosecutor. In doing so he earned public praise and the scorn of countless defense attorneys whose clients endured Myers’ courtroom theatrics. Once, grieving the death of his own son in 2003, Myers pressed for the death penalty against Robert Northcutt, who had confessed to killing his 4-year-old daughter because she wouldn’t stop crying. Here’s how one reporter in 2006 chronicled what happened at the trial:

    Myers snubbed the defense attorney by reading the sports section of The State newspaper when the attorney questioned witnesses. Myers bent a doll's back over a crib's rail to show jurors how Northcutt broke his daughter's back.

    In his closing argument, he covered the crib with a black cloth and wheeled it past the jury box like a funeral procession. In the crib was a sheet that belonged to his son.

    "He was always with me," Myers said, fighting back tears. "That was a way of keeping him close to me."

    Myers cried at least 16 times during his closing argument, according to an appeal of the case filed with the state Supreme Court.

    Northcutt's lawyer, David Bruck, said Myers was out of control. Bruck objected 20 times during Myers' argument, including when Myers said a life sentence would "declare open season on babies in Lexington County.”

    Earlier this month, after his second drunk driving arrest, but before Judge Gergel admonished him, Myers announced that he won’t run again when his current term expires in January. And now Bennett’s fate is again uncertain. A black man convicted of murdering another black man, Bennett was first sentenced to death in 1995. That conviction was overturned in 1997 when the lawyers learned that a juror had been seated in the capital trial even after he said he would “go with the majority of the jury” even if he had doubts “as to whether the defendant should get the death penalty.”

    Bennett, a large, hulking man, then was re-sentenced to death in 2000 by an all-white jury in Lexington County. When one witness, a white woman, testified that Bennett had attacked her weeks before the murder, Myers asked the witness if she had dreamt of anything while in a coma. Yes, she told jurors, “Indians were chasing me trying to kill me, and the thing I thought was they were black.” Both before and after that answer, Bennett’s lawyer objected and moved for a mistrial. It was denied; the prosecutor had not elicited the “black Indian” dream testimony, a state judge subsequently (and erroneously) ruled.

    Later, Myers introduced testimony that Bennett had had sex with a female prison guard while awaiting his trial. During his cross-examination of the witness, Myers identified the guard as “the blond-headed lady.” Again, Bennett’s lawyer immediately objected and asked for a mistrial, arguing that Myers had improperly signalled the all-white Southern jury that the big black defendant had a white lover. The trial judge again overruled the defense, declaring in open court: “maybe it [sic] just the way things are these days, but when somebody says blond, I don’t necessarily see a white woman.” All of this was a precursor to Myers’ closing argument. Bennett’s lawyer had claimed his client had been a compliant prisoner, that he would not pose a future danger if given a life sentence. To this Myers responded by calling Bennett “a monster” and a “caveman” and a “beast of burden” before telling jurors this:

    “If you give him life, the real Johnny will come back. You give him life and he’ll come back out. Meeting him again will be like meeting King Kong on a bad day.”

    Another request for a mistrial. Another denial by the trial judge. And Bennett was sentenced to death. Then, six years later, one of Bennett’s post-conviction lawyers asked one of the jurors from that 2000 sentencing why the juror had thought Bennett had killed his victim.” “Because he was just a dumb nigger,” the juror candidly responded. “I apologize for saying that word,” the juror then said under oath, “but after going through that thing for an entire week and all the evidence piling up against him, that was just the way I felt about it.”

    Even this admission from one of the people who put Bennett on death row did not sway the South Carolina courts. The juror’s post-trial statement did not justify granting Bennett relief, state court judges concluded in 2006, because it did not establish that the juror was “racially biased at the time of the resentencing trial.” Seven years later, in 2013, the South Carolina Supreme Court refused to reconsider that issue. One year after that Bennett’s attorneys filed their federal habeas petition.

    Which brings us back to Judge Gergel. “It is notable that none of the reviewing (state) courts evaluated the potential impact of these various racially charged statements or evidence collectively, analyzing each in isolation,” he wrote in his March 16 order. “Further, no court addressed what was clearly [Myers’] calculated effort to introduce the challenged evidence.” But the federal judge saved his most pointed analysis for Myers’ “King Kong” reference during closing argument. He wrote:

    “The Court is mindful that the state courts have characterized [Myers’] King Kong statement as a harmless reference to [Bennett’s] immense size without any racial overtones. The Court finds such an analysis involves ‘an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence…’

    The fact that [Bennett] is a very large black man makes the King Kong reference even more odious and inflammatory in this case because it plays upon a racist stereotype of the bestial black savage that seems calculated to animate and excite the all-white Lexington County jury.”

    Judge Gergel also tackled the issue of the juror who had called Bennett “just a dumb nigger.” The South Carolina courts had failed here, also, to protect Bennett’s constitutional rights to a fair trial free from racial animus. “If this blatant statement of racial hostility does not amount to evidence of constitutionally impermissible racial bias,” the judge wrote, “it is hard to imagine what evidence could meet that standard.”

    Myers promised last week to appeal Judge Gergel’s order and it’s likely that this appeal, to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, will outlast the remainder of Myers’ career in public office. He did not respond to a request for comment from The Marshall Project. Meanwhile, for all the bluster, six of Myers’ 28 capital defendants have been executed. Another 12 have had their sentences shortened to life without parole.

    https://www.themarshallproject.org/2...ong#.zmrI5zrhk

  5. #5
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On April 15, 2016, the State of South Carolina filed an appeal before the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

    https://dockets.justia.com/docket/ci...ourts/ca4/16-3

  6. #6
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On October 25, 2016, oral argument will be heard in the State of South Carolina's appeal before the Fourth Circuit.

    http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/calend...t252016ric.pdf

  7. #7
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    JOHNNY BENNETT v BRYAN P. STIRLING

    In today's Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals opinions, the court AFFIRMED the district court's grant of habeas corpus on racial bias during sentencing.
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  8. #8
    Administrator Helen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    20,875
    Appellate court agrees on throwing out SC death sentence

    COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) – An appellate court says a South Carolina man should be released from death row because a prosecutor’s “racially coded references” made a fair sentencing impossible.

    The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that a lower federal court was right to throw out the death sentence against Johnny O. Bennett.

    Bennett has been on South Carolina’s death row for two decades for the killing of a 24-year-old man, stabbed more than 60 times with a screwdriver. He was first sentenced to death in 1997, but that was overturned. A jury sentenced Bennett to death again in 2000.

    In that second trial, before an all-white jury, Solicitor Donnie Myers compared Bennett, who is black, to “King Kong on a bad day.”

    Myers didn’t return a message seeking comment.

    http://counton2.com/2016/11/21/appel...eath-sentence/
    "I realize this may sound harsh, but as a father and former lawman, I really don't care if it's by lethal injection, by the electric chair, firing squad, hanging, the guillotine or being fed to the lions."
    - Oklahoma Rep. Mike Christian

    "There are some people who just do not deserve to live,"
    - Rev. Richard Hawke

    “There are lots of extremely smug and self-satisfied people in what would be deemed lower down in society, who also deserve to be pulled up. In a proper free society, you should be allowed to make jokes about absolutely anything.”
    - Rowan Atkinson

  9. #9
    Senior Member CnCP Legend Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,795
    "There is a point in the history of a society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that among other things it sides even with those who harm it, criminals, and does this quite seriously and honestly. Punishing somehow seems unfair to it, and it is certain that imagining ‘punishment’ and ‘being supposed to punish’ hurts it, arouses fear in it." Friedrich Nietzsche

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •