Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Stephen Christopher Stanko - South Carolina Death Row

  1. #11
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    Convicted double-murderer Stanko seeking new trial in Horry County case

    Twice-convicted murderer Stephen Stanko, who is awaiting the death penalty in separate Horry County and Georgetown County cases, is seeking a new trial here by claiming his lawyers failed to properly defend him against one of the capital murder charges.

    Stanko on Monday filed a motion for a post-conviction relief proceeding that could potentially grant him a new trial in the shooting death of 74-year-old Henry Turner of Conway. An Horry County jury convicted Stanko of the murder in 2009 and the state Supreme Court last year upheld that conviction. A post-conviction relief proceeding is the next step in the judicial process.

    Stanko also was sentenced to death after being convicted in 2006 by a Georgetown County jury in the death of his 43-year-old live-in girlfriend, Laura Ling.

    Stanko, in court documents filed Monday, said his lawyers failed to present evidence that jurors had been prejudiced by widespread pre-trial publicity. Stanko said those lawyers also failed to present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of his trial. The filing does not state what mitigating evidence was available.

    Stanko also revived an argument he made during his supreme court appeal, in which he challenges a state law that exempts all citizens over the age of 65 from jury service. Stanko says that exemption prevented him from having a jury pool drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The state Supreme Court ruled that the over-65 population is not a distinctive age group possessing "cohesiveness of ideas, attitudes or experiences that distinguishes them from the rest of society."

    Stanko's crime spree took place in April 2005, when Stanko killed Ling in the Murrells Inlet home that he shared with her and Ling's then-15-year-old daughter, who also was assaulted. Stanko took Ling's car, drove to Turner's home in Conway and killed him before stealing Turner's pickup truck.

    Stanko then fled to Columbia, where he claimed he was a New York millionaire and flirted with several women at a downtown restaurant. From there, Stanko traveled to Augusta, Ga., and met another woman and spent the weekend with her before he was arrested there. Stanko told the woman he was a businessman in town for a golf tournament.

    In his defense, Stanko claimed a brain defect caused him to not be aware of the criminal responsibility for his actions.

    (Source: myrtlebeachonline.com)
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  2. #12
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    Death row murderer Stephen Stanko seeking new trial in Conway man’s killing

    The attorney who represented twice-convicted murderer Stephen Stanko testified Monday he continues to support his defense theory that the 47-year-old suffers from brain damage that caused him to be insane during his 2005 double killing spree.

    However, members of the defense team in the separate murder cases in Horry and Georgetown counties testified they never thought such a defense was viable.

    Stanko, who is awaiting the death penalty in both cases, is seeking a new trial in the shooting death of 74-year-old Henry Turner of Conway.

    It took about an hour in 2009 for an Horry County jury to sentence Stanko to death after convicting him of Turner’s murder, and the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld that conviction and sentence in 2013.

    Stanko is seeking post-conviction relief, which is the next step in the judicial process where a judge decides the outcome, and testimony began Monday in Conway.

    In this proceeding, Stanko claims his attorneys failed to properly defend him in the Horry County capital murder case.

    Stanko also was sentenced to death after being convicted in 2006 by a Georgetown County jury in the death of his 43-year-old live-in girlfriend, Laura Ling. Decisions in this week’s proceedings will have not bearing on Stanko’s conviction or his sentence in Ling’s murder.

    Stanko’s crime spree took place in April 2005, when Stanko killed Ling in the Murrells Inlet home that he shared with her and Ling’s then-15-year-old daughter, who also was assaulted. Stanko took Ling’s car, drove to Turner’s home in Conway and killed him before stealing Turner’s pickup truck.

    Stanko then fled to Columbia, where he claimed he was a New York millionaire and flirted with several women at a downtown restaurant. From there, Stanko traveled to Augusta, Ga., and met another woman and spent the weekend with her before he was arrested there. Stanko told the woman he was a businessman in town for a golf tournament.

    In both trials Stanko’s defense was that he suffered a brain defect that caused him to not be aware of the criminal responsibility for his actions.

    Myrtle Beach attorney Bill Diggs testified for nearly three hours Monday about his representation of Stanko in both trials.

    “Stephen did some pretty terrible things. He doesn’t seem like the kind of person who would do that. . . . I wanted to explain why he did that,” said Diggs, who was suspended from law practice in October and is under investigation by the state Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

    Diggs testified his suspension doesn’t impact Stanko’s case or his truthfulness in the proceedings.

    The use of scans to detect Stanko’s brain function and medical experts, who testified Stanko was insane at the time of his crimes, was new in criminal defense at that time of both trials, Diggs said.

    “At the time he pulled the trigger on Mr. Turner I don’t think his brain was working,” Diggs said Monday. “When he killed Laura Ling he walked through the house and cleaned up. He did all those events in a blackout state.”

    During the trial in Turner’s death, experts testified that the frontal lobes of Stanko’s brain were damaged. They pointed to the complicated pregnancy Stanko’s mother had with him and an episode when Stanko was 16-years-old and struck in the head with a beer bottle as the causes of the damage.

    The frontal lobe defense was used in both trials, and Diggs said Monday he never considered changing his strategy for the Turner trial. He also said he understood Stanko would argue he was ineffective when Stanko filed for post-conviction relief.

    “It’s not something I focused on . . . I understand it was something he had to do,” Diggs said. “I always understood Stephen to be happy with the defense because it allowed him to understand why he did those things.”

    But two women, who worked as investigators for Diggs on both trials, testified they didn’t think the defense was appropriate for the case.

    Dale Davis, who worked as a mitigation specialist on the Ling case, testified Monday that she refused to help with the Turner case because Diggs was using the same defense in both trials.

    “The theory was that [Stanko] was a psychopath and couldn’t help but kill people,” Davis said. “I thought it was a crazy theory to expect a jury to spare your client’s life.”

    Davis testified Monday she noticed similarities in Stanko’s defense compared to that of Augusta, Ga., serial killer Reinaldo Rivera, who is awaiting his death sentence. An expert from that 2004 trial was used in Stanko’s trial and deemed both defendants psychopaths, she said.

    “I was extremely upset in the way the case was handled. I thought it was a crazy defense. I thought it was a prosecution case, not a defense case. I thought it was like walking someone to death’s door,” Davis testified Monday.

    Vicki Childs, who was a defense investigator in both of Stanko’s trials, said changing the defense was never discussed and there was no debriefing after the Georgetown County conviction and sentence, before they represented Stanko in the Conway murder.

    “I don’t believe Stephen is insane,” Childs said. “Stephen was happy there was some indication in his brain that helped him understand why he did what he did.”

    http://www.heraldonline.com/2015/03/...#storylink=cpy
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  3. #13
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Judge to decide whether convicted killer Stephen Stanko gets new trial

    After listening to two days of testimony, a circuit court judge now must decide whether death-row murderer Stephen Stanko should get a new trial in the 2005 killing of his live-in girlfriend in their shared Murrells Inlet home.

    Testimony concluded Tuesday evening in Stanko’s post-conviction relief hearing where he sought a new trial because he claimed his original attorneys were ineffective during his 2006 trial and several other legal issues.

    Circuit Court Judge W. Jeffrey Young will issue his decision later.

    The 47-year-old’s trial attorney, Bill Diggs, testified for nearly four hours Tuesday afternoon about his representation of Stanko and his thought process of arriving at the defense that Stanko suffered from a brain defect.

    Stanko was sentenced to death after being convicted in 2006 by a Georgetown County jury in the death of his 43-year-old live-in girlfriend, Laura Ling. Stanko also was sentenced to death in the shooting death of 74-year-old Henry Turner of Conway. He also has appealed that decision and is awaiting a judge’s decision.

    Stanko’s crime spree took place in April 2005, when Stanko brutally killed Ling in the Murrells Inlet home that he shared with her and Ling’s then-15-year-old daughter, who also was also beaten, raped and left for dead, official said.

    On Tuesday, Diggs disputed testimony from the previous day that he used drugs during the time he represented Stanko. Diggs also invoked his Fifth Amendment right when asked about why he was suspended in September from practicing law by a state legal disciplinary counsel.

    “It has nothing to do with drug use or this case,” Diggs said.

    Diggs also disputed claims made by another attorney and specialists, who worked on the case with him, that the group did not agree on the way they were going to defend Stanko during trial. Diggs had previously worked on six death penalty cases and had one acquittal in another Georgetown County case.

    “I knew it was going to be difficult to defend. I looked at the case and realized there was no defense in explaining why he did this and the justification,” Diggs said and noted that’s when he realized they needed to look at mental illness and brain issues with Stanko.

    “Laura Ling was one of the few people in the world who cared about Stephen. . . .When you meet him in person he comes across as quite normal and a likeable person,” Diggs said. “I came up with the question of what the brain does and I went to a couple of experts and came up with the defense from that.”

    Scans of Stanko’s brain and experts said he had brain deficits that impacted his ability to think clearly and so Diggs said he decided on the defense that Stanko was insane at the time he killed Ling.

    “No one could look at the facts of this case and come out and not say this man is sick,” Diggs said. “Stephen is very smart, he has a very high IQ. He fully understood what the defense was about. I think he was at peace with it because he understood how it happened and why it happened.”

    Stanko’s attorney in the hearing, Stuart Axelrod asked Diggs why he never petitioned for lesser charges of voluntary manslaughter to be presented to the jury during the trial. Axelrod said Stanko told a psychiatrist that Ling slapped his cigarette during an argument and it went into his eye and burnt him. After that Stanko said he didn’t remember the killing or assault until he was in the shower, Axelrod said.

    “I never considered presenting that. I didn’t want to be seen as blaming the victim,” Diggs said. “I never took seriously the idea that I could use that as a defense and ask for a lesser charge.”

    Stanko became upset and spoke aloud during Tuesday’s hearing when Diggs said he thought Ling was the only person to help Stanko by taking him into her home.

    “If Laura hadn’t come along I think Stephen would have been homeless,” Diggs said.

    Stanko shook his head and said, “He’s lying.”

    http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/new...e19834551.html

  4. #14
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    Stanko's case is to be featured tonight at 8:00 p.m. EDT on Investigation Discovery's 48 Hours on ID episode Murder on His Mind.

    Murdeerr Stephen Stanko's lawyer presents images of his brain to prove he suffers from brain damage
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  5. #15
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    Stanko's case is featured tonight at 9:00 p.m. EDT on Investigation Discovery's Southern Fried Homicide episode Homicidal Hospitality.
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  6. #16
    Moderator Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Newport, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,454
    Convicted killer Stanko to remain on death row

    There will be no post conviction relief for a man sentenced to death for a crime spree that raged through Horry and Georgetown counties leaving two people dead and a third severely wounded.

    Stephen Stanko, 48, who has been living on South Carolina’s death row since August of 2006, asked for relief for his Horry County crimes saying his attorneys didn’t defend him adequately in his pretrial hearings and in his Horry County trial, and his appeal attorneys were inefficient in their appeal of his case.

    He also argued that South Carolina’s death penalty is unconstitutional.

    Circuit Judge Benjamin Culbertson ruled against all of Stanko’s claims, leaving his Horry County death penalty sentence intact.

    Stanko still has a post-conviction relief request pending in Georgetown County.

    Stanko was sentenced to death for the 2005 murders of Laura Ling and Henry Turner.

    A Georgetown County jury found Stanko guilty in 2006 of killing Ling, a former librarian, and sentenced him to death. An Horry County jury reached the same verdict and sentence in 2009 for Turner’s murder.

    In the 2015 post-conviction hearing, Stanko’s trial attorney Bill Diggs testified for three hours that he believed his client suffered from a brain defect, and that defect led him to commit murder.

    Under methodical questioning from Stanko’s PCR attorney Emily Paavola, executive director of the Death Penalty Resource & Defense Center, Diggs testified that Stanko’s personality was inconsistent with the murders he was later found guilty of committing.

    “He didn’t seem to be the person who would intentionally do those things,” Diggs testified.

    In his PCR application, Stanko’s attorneys argued that Diggs shouldn’t have been allowed to represent Stanko in Turner’s case because he had already represented him unsuccessfully in his Georgetown County trial when he was convicted of murder, first-degree criminal sexual conduct, assault and battery with intent to kill, armed robbery and two counts of kidnapping. Stanko’s attorneys claim that Diggs had a conflict of interest because there was already a request for post-conviction relief on those charges claiming that Diggs had not defended him adequately.

    But in his ruling filed in the Horry County Clerk of Court’s Office this past week, Culbertson pointed out that Stanko was questioned and advised extensively regarding Diggs’ representation with the PCR application pending, and, despite that, Stanko wanted Diggs to continue as his lawyer and he waived any conflict of interest that may have existed. The same issue was denied in Stanko’s appeal, according to Culbertson’s ruling.

    Stanko’s PCR application also claimed that his attorney didn’t ask to have the trial changed to a different location before jury selection began in Horry County where his charges had received huge publicity.

    But Culbertson says his criminal trial attorney did raise a motion to change the venue before jury selection. However, he said, the State objected to hearing the motion prior to jury selection, so Diggs consented to argue the motion after striking the jury, but before its members were sworn. Diggs also hired an expert, Dr. Tony Albiniak, who testified at the motion hearing that potential jurors are often not forthcoming in their responses during pretrial questioning.

    Diggs argued the motion at the agreed time, but the motion was denied, Culbertson noted. The same claim was also denied in Stanko’s appeal.

    Stanko’s attorneys also argued that the S.C. death penalty statute is unconstitutional “because [it] does not genuinely narrow the class of offenders eligible for a death sentence,...”

    But Culbertson said that issue was also dealt with in Stanko’s appeal, and he wrote that the constitutionality of the death penalty act “is well settled.”

    Culbertson wrote that for a post-conviction relief application to be successful, the applicant must prove he is entitled to relief and to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, he or she must prove that a reasonable probability exists that, but for the counsel’s errors, the result of the trial would have been different.

    Culbertson found that different attorneys would not have secured a benefit more favorable to Stanko.

    The request for PCR also argues that Stanko didn’t get a fundamentally fair trial because the State presented “false and misleading, inaccurate and unreliable” expert testimony through Dr. Kenneth Spicer who compared Stanko’s brain PET scan to an inappropriate database and testified that the PET scan was perfectly normal.

    Stanko’s defense team provided Dr. Joseph L. Chong-Sang Wu as a rebuttal to Spicer’s testimony.

    Stanko also believes his attorneys erred in the sentencing phase of his trial because they told the jury that Stanko’s family didn’t like him and pointed out that they didn’t attend the trial; provided expert testimony that Stanko was a psychopath; and didn’t investigate well enough his life history, background and mental health.

    However Culbertson said this was a conscious decision by the attorneys who believed if they could persuade the jury that Stanko’s family was so angry and disappointed with him that they felt justified in not coming to the trial that it would support his defense that he wasn’t able to conform to normal behavior.

    “Counsel’s argument to the jury that Stanko’s family was not in attendance at the trial was an intentional trial strategy to curry sympathy for his client,” Culbertson wrote.

    And, he wrote that providing an expert witness to confirm that Stanko is a psychopath was intended to shore up his insanity defense and make him appear less culpable by showing that he could not control his actions.

    Culbertson says Stanko’s attorneys did present Stanko’s life history, background and mental health, most of which was gathered in the Georgetown County case.

    The PCR Hearing

    When doctors diagnosed Stanko as a psychopath with a personality disorder, Diggs said he decided it was the best way to save Stanko’s life, but Russell Stetler, a mitigation expert, said the psychopathy defense dehumanizes defendants in the eyes of a jury and is successful in only nine out of every 1,000 cases because it immediately brings to jurors’ minds thoughts of law breaking, callousness and a lack of empathy.

    It doesn’t resonate with jurors or make them want to be merciful, he said.

    But, Diggs said, he thought Stanko was okay with the defense and was even happy to finally understand why he did the things he did.

    He testified that Stanko was a very good student in his younger days and provided pictures from his high school prom that proved his popularity. Diggs also described him as talented, but things began to change for him between the ages of 15 and his mid 20s, he said.

    He said Stanko is likeable when he’s in one-on-one conversations and his problems come when he feels threatened.

    Dale Davis, who acted as the mitigation expert in Stanko’s Georgetown trial, turned down an offer to stay on the case in Horry County because she disagreed with Digg’s plan to stick with the psychopathy defense.

    In her mitigation investigation, she learned that Stanko’s father was born in Cuba and was a strict military parent. She said Stanko graduated 11th in his class out of more than 200 students and seemed to be headed “for great things.”

    She didn’t think that Stanko was mentally ill, but said she saw some obsessive-compulsive behavior in him.

    Vicki Childs, the fact investigator and mitigation expert in the Horry County case, said she relied heavily on information collected in the Georgetown trial.

    Childs’ job was to review police and autopsy reports and to interview possible witnesses.

    She said Diggs was so excited about a PET scan done by one of the doctors on the case that showed brain problems that he was like “a kid in a candy store.”

    She also said she felt badly for Stanko because there was no one willing to come to the trial to support him.

    She testified that Stanko told her he was skeptical about the insanity defense, but agreed that he was happy to find out that there was some indication in his brain to show why he did what he did

    Conway attorney Brana Williams, who assisted Diggs with the Horry County trial, testified in the 2015 PCR hearing that the defense team did all it could for Stanko.

    Williams said the evidence against Stanko was overwhelming and that avoiding a death sentence was the primary goal in the trial.

    “The facts of this case were terrible and as a defense lawyer you do your best to look for any type of explanation and, quite frankly, we were very limited. We just didn’t have a lot to work with,” she said.

    Williams said the defense tried to show that Stanko had organic problems with his brain, and came from a dysfunctional family in hopes that the jury would sentence him to life.

    “We were trying to show there’s a reason he’s like that and, in lieu of death, he should get a life sentence,” she said. “He does have an issue and it’s so bad his family won’t have anything to do with him.”

    http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/crim...1bef32bee.html

  7. #17
    Senior Member CnCP Legend Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,795
    Death row inmate Stephen Stanko to appear for hearing in Georgetown County

    By Brad Dickerson
    WMBFNews

    GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC (WMBF) – Stephen Stanko, who is currently sitting on death row after being convicted in two Grand Strand murders, will appear in a Georgetown County courtroom later this month.

    According to Georgetown County Court Clerk Alma White, Stanko will appear for a post-conviction relief hearing on Jan. 28. Judge Donald Brown will be presiding.

    White added the notice came from the South Carolina Court Administration Office.

    A Georgetown County jury sentenced Stanko to death in 2006 for the 2005 murder of his live-in girlfriend, Laura Ling, and the rape of her daughter.

    Four years later, an Horry County jury gave Stanko the ultimate punishment for the 2005 killing of 74-year-old Henry Turner of Conway.

    A judge previously denied Stanko’s request for post-conviction relief for his Horry County crimes, according to WMBF News partner My Horry News. The inmate argued his attorneys didn’t defend him adequately in his pretrial hearings and in his trial, and his appeal attorneys were inefficient in their appeal of his case.

    Stanko is also one of the South Carolina death row inmates who filed a federal lawsuit claiming “cruel and baseless solitary confinement.”

    According to records from the S.C. Department of Corrections, Stanko is currently being housed at the Kirkland Correctional Institution in Columbia.

    http://www.wmbfnews.com/2019/01/17/d...getown-county/

  8. #18
    Moderator Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Newport, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,454
    Stephen Stanko, notorious double murderer of Murrells Inlet, fights death penalty

    GEORGETOWN - A man on death row for killing two people in a 2005 crime spree across the Grand Strand is in a Georgetown County court this week as he fights for a new trial.

    Stephen Stanko is in court Monday for a post-conviction rights hearing, which is expected to last a couple of days. A judge previously ruled that Stanko’s trial lawyers did not meet qualifications to represent him in a death penalty case. This week’s hearing is to try and determine if that created a bias against Stanko.

    Depending on the judge’s ruling, the end result could be a new trial for Stanko, sending the decades-old case back to square one.

    In April 2005, Stanko killed his girlfriend, 43-year-old Laura Ling, in a Murrells Inlet home. He then assaulted Ling’s 15-year-old daughter and left her to die. She survived the attack.

    Stanko drove Ling’s car to 74-year-old Henry Turner’s Conway home and killed him. He then stole Turner’s truck and fled to Columbia. There, he claimed to be a New York millionaire and flirted with several women at a restaurant. When he traveled to Augusta, Georgia, he met another woman and spent a weekend with her before he was arrested.

    Stanko was sentenced to death for both killings and is on death row at Kirkland Correctional Institution in Columbia.

    https://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/ne...225175635.html
    "How do you get drunk on death row?" - Werner Herzog

    "When we get fruit, we get the juice and water. I ferment for a week! It tastes like chalk, it's nasty" - Blaine Keith Milam #999558 Texas Death Row

  9. #19
    Senior Member CnCP Legend CharlesMartel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    3,073
    Is Grand Strand’s notorious killer Stephen Stanko a psychopath? Depends who you ask.

    By Alex Lang
    The Myrtle Beach Sun-News

    Infamous double-murderer Stephen Stanko was once called a “psychopath” in the same vein as serial killers Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy.

    Now, a doctor said that was a misdiagnosis.

    “I just didn’t think it was accurate diagnosis,” Dr. Joseph Wu said Tuesday from a Georgetown witness stand.

    The phrase was used to describe Stanko during his first trials where he was sentenced to death for two killings in 2005. Doctors described him as having anti-social behaviors similar to some of the country’s most famous serial killers. Wu said he feels there is an underlying medical condition for Stanko’s behaviors.

    Wu testified during a hearing as Stanko seeks a new trial. He is currently on death row for killing his then-girlfriend Laura Ling and then driving to Conway to kill another man. After killing Ling, Stanko raped and assaulted Ling’s 15-year-old daughter.

    He has made several attempts for a new trials in Horry and Georgetown counties, but they were rejected. He is in a Georgetown County courtroom this week arguing that his lawyers in one appeal were ineffective.

    Previous appeals and trials focused on scans of Stanko’s brain, which were again discussed Tuesday.

    Wu said he analyzed the scans and feels Stanko has an undiagnosed epilepsy disorder. There are recent studies that show people with such conditions in extreme situations can act aggressively and commit “bizarre” acts without any intention.

    “This seems to fit the situation,” Wu said.

    Shortly before Stanko committed the murders, one of his victims threatened to expose him as a child molester, Wu said. The medical condition causes an “electrical storm” in the brain, and when there is stress, it can lead a person to act out and disrupt their memory, Wu said.

    During cross-examination, Wu confirmed the scans were from 2006. The doctor also said he never spoke to Stanko before reaching his conclusions.

    Several witnesses testified on Stanko’s behalf Tuesday as his lawyers finished presenting their case on why Stanko should have a new trial. The judge said he would issue his ruling later.

    Arlene Andrews is a social worker and examined Stanko’s life before and after the crimes. She said Stanko does better in a structured environment, such as prison.

    Stanko was released from prison on kidnapping, fraudulent schemes and other charges about a year before he met Ling. Andrews said Stanko slipped back into his old habits after the two became involved. People were calling in debts, and Stanko had family issues leading up to the killings.

    “There were a number of stressors converging on his life,” Andrews said.

    https://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/ne...225225540.html
    In the Shadow of Your Wings
    1 A Prayer of David. Hear a just cause, O Lord; attend to my cry! Give ear to my prayer from lips free of deceit!

  10. #20
    Moderator Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,316
    On May 17, 2022, Stanko filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

    https://dockets.justia.com/docket/ci...ourts/ca4/22-2
    Thank you for the adventure - Axol

    Tried so hard and got so far, but in the end it doesn’t even matter - Linkin Park

    Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired. My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever. - Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt

    I’m going to the ghost McDonalds - Garcello

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •