izmir escort izmir escort antalya escort porno jigolo izmir escort bursa escort instagram hesap kapatma backlink satışı havalandırma sistemleri porno izle instagram takipçi satın al saha betonu leadersmm.com facebook sayfa beğeni satın al alsancak escort eskişehir escort bayan Sammie Louis Stokes - South Carolina Death Row
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sammie Louis Stokes - South Carolina Death Row

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,533

    Sammie Louis Stokes - South Carolina Death Row




    Summary of Offense:

    Sammie L. Stokes was sent to the South Carolina Department of Corrections on Halloween Day 1999 after being found guilty on charges of murder, kidnapping, criminal conspiracy and first-degree criminal sexual misconduct. The charges against the 37-year-old Orangeburg man were levied after the nearly nude body of Connie Snipes, 21, who lived near Bamberg, was found in Branchville in May 1998. She had been shot twice in the head and an autopsy showed she had been sexually assaulted. Stokes and Snipes had been acquaintances prior to the mutilation and killing of Snipes.

  2. #2
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    12,579
    Stokes' sentence was affirmed by the South Carolina Supreme Court on direct appeal on May 29, 2001.

    http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opin...s/SC/25298.htm

    On October 17, 2001, Stokes filed an application for post-conviction relief in Orangeburg County Circuit Court.

    On October 22, 2010, Stokes' application was denied.

    http://www.orangeburgcounty.org/scjd...rstName=Sammie

  3. #3
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    12,579
    On March 9, 2016, Stokes filed a habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    https://dockets.justia.com/docket/so...mc00073/226933

  4. #4
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,128
    Supreme Court weighs lawyers' actions in 2 death row cases

    Seven years before Thomas Sims defended Sammie Stokes in a South Carolina death-penalty trial, he had prosecuted Stokes for assaulting his ex-wife.

    The trial record shows Sims never told the judge in the murder case about that earlier prosecution, not even when the ex-wife took the stand against his client to recount the assault.

    Stokes' case is one of two the Supreme Court is weighing in which death-row inmates are raising questions about the actions of their lawyers. In the other, James Tyler of Louisiana pleaded not guilty to the murder charge against him, but his lawyer conceded Tyler's guilt and did nothing to poke holes in eyewitness accounts that helped convict Tyler. The justices have yet to decide whether to hear either case, but word could come Monday.

    The high court has taken up many cases that involve the Constitution's guarantee of a competent lawyer to a criminal defendant, but these cases pose different issues for the justices.

    In the one from Louisiana, the question is whether Tyler's rights were violated when the lawyer overrode his objections and put up no defense to the charge against him, choosing instead to focus on trying to avoid a death sentence. In the South Carolina case, the issue is whether Sims had a conflict of interest that prevented him from effectively representing his client.

    Sims never told the judge in Stokes' murder trial in 1999 of his prior involvement in prosecuting Stokes, or that the earlier case relied in large part on the testimony of Stokes' ex-wife, Audrey Smith, according to Stokes' current lawyers.

    When prosecutors called Smith to testify in the sentencing phase of the trial, Sims pulled his punches, the lawyers wrote in their Supreme Court filing.

    "Faced with the witness whose cause and credibility he previously championed, Sims ignored multiple significant exaggerations and inconsistencies in Smith's testimony," they wrote.

    Keir Weyble, Stokes' lead lawyer, pointed to a high court ruling from June in which the court said a Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice should have stepped aside from a case in which he had personally approved the prosecution 30 years earlier. "The core principle is the same," Weyble said.

    Sims, in private practice in Orangeburg, South Carolina, rejected the idea that he did anything wrong.

    "It's easy to sit 16 years later and say what someone didn't do 16 years before. I fought for Sammie and I wanted him to live out his life," Sims said.

    Sims said he and Stokes discussed the matter and that Stokes said he wanted Sims to remain as his lawyer.

    In Tyler's case, there was no genetic evidence implicating Tyler found at the scene of the crime or on his clothing. Police never recovered the gun used to kill an employee of a Pizza Hut restaurant in Shreveport, Louisiana.

    An eyewitness who was shot but survived described the shooter as "real short," about 4'10", or nearly a foot shorter than Tyler. The other surviving shooting victim failed to pick Tyler out of a series of photos or a subsequent lineup, even though he was the only person common to both. A prostitute who testified against Tyler had served as a police informant who also had had charges against her dropped in exchange for her cooperation.

    But defense lawyers did not attempt to discredit the prosecution witnesses because they already had conceded Tyler's guilt, over their client's repeated objections.

    Cathy Kelly, a Louisiana lawyer who worked on Tyler's appeal, said the trial team had plenty of material to work with. "They made a decision without investigating it," Kelly said. "From the very beginning this was the way they were going to go."

    Alan Golden, the lead defense lawyer at Tyler's trial, said the case against Tyler was strong. Tyler went from his run-down hotel to the Pizza Hut across the street with "a gun in one hand and a ski mask in the other," Golden recalled. "The problem was, the ski mask wasn't on."

    Tyler's lawyers decided the best thing they could do was try to persuade the jury to sentence him to life in prison, instead of death, Golden said.

    Golden, now in private practice in Shreveport after many years as a public defender, said he couldn't recall whether Tyler objected to his trial strategy.

    http://www.aberdeennews.com/wire/pol...36f00b8bd.html
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  5. #5
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,128
    In today's orders, the United States Supreme Court declined to review Stokes' petition for certiorari.

    Lower Ct: Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina, Orangeburg County
    Case Nos.: (01-CP-38-1240)
    Decision Date: October 21, 2010
    Discretionary Court
    Decision Date: February 12, 2016
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  6. #6
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    12,579
    On September 28, 2018, Stokes' habeas petition was DENIED by United States District Court Judge Robert Bryan Harwell (G.W. Bush).

    https://casetext.com/case/stokes-v-stirling-6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •