Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ronnie Keith Williams - Florida

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,534

    Ronnie Keith Williams - Florida






    Summary of Offense:

    Ronnie Keith Williams was found guilty of the 1993 stabbing of Lisa Dyke, which resulted in her death 19 days later. On January 25, 1993, Ronnie Williams and his girlfriend’s sister, Ruth Lawrence, had a disagreement at the apartment Ruth lived in with her son David and the victim, Lisa Dyke. After the fight, Stephanie Lawrence, Williams’ girlfriend, told Williams he was no longer welcome at either her or her sister’s home.

    On January 26, 1993, 911 operator Ilona Gerdner received an emergency call at approximately 8:30 a.m. from a distressed female caller who identified herself as Lisa Dyke. Gardner testified that the caller was begging for help because she had been stabbed. When she asked the victim who had stabbed her, Dyke’s response was a name that Gardner said sounded like “Rodney,” but she later identified the name as “Ronnie” when the tape was played back for her. Gardner dispatched Officers Gillespie and Costello who arrived within one minute at the apartment Dyke shared with Ruth and David.

    When the officers knocked, Dyke answered the door nude and bleeding from numerous wounds. The victim was more than seven months pregnant at the time of the attack. As paramedics treated her, Officer Gillespie questioned the victim as to who had assaulted her. Through the oxygen mask Dyke was wearing, Gillespie heard Dyke’s response as “Rodney.” When asked to clarify, Dyke answered “Ruth’s sister’s boyfriend” and gave him the telephone number of “Ruth’s sister.” Dyke also asserted that he had raped her, though hospital personnel were unable to perform a rape examination or collect evidentiary samples before she was rushed into surgery.

    While processing the crime scene, Detective Cerat noticed no sign of forced entry but observed blood on the floor, dust ruffle, door, bedroom door (which contained a finger print), and found a bloodied knife found beside the victim’s bed. After Dyke was taken to the hospital, Cerat collected bloody clothing, lifted six prints from the crime scene, and sent them to the lab for identification. At the hospital, Officer Jones showed Dyke a photo lineup and asked her if she could identify one of the persons in the lineup as her assailant. Dyke identified Ronnie K. Williams.

    Two days later, Jones photographed bite marks found on the victim’s body and these marks were compared with dental imprints taken from Williams. Forensic dentist Richard Souviron identified the photographs of the bite marks as matching those taken from Williams’ dental imprints. Fingerprint analyst Fred Boy testified that a fingerprint found in a red substance located on the bathroom door of Ruth’s apartment matched Williams’ left ring finger. DNA testing on blood samples taken from clothing in the apartment revealed a match to Williams’ DNA profile at four genetic locations. The frequency of finding the same profile in two unrelated individuals matching at these four points would be 1 in 120 million African-Americans.

    The medical examiner noted that Lisa Dyke had been stabbed seven times, six of which were between one-quarter of an inch and one-half inch deep. The seventh stab wound was approximately four inches deep and had punctured her left lung. Lisa Dyke’s official cause of death on February 14, 1993 was deemed to be multiple stab wounds that produced a fatally high level of toxicity in her body.

    Williams was sentenced to death in Broward County on April 16, 2004.

  2. #2
    Senior Member CnCP Legend JLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,740
    Factors Contributing to the Delay in Imposition of Sentence:

    It took a little over a year and a half for the Florida Supreme Court to set a brief schedule for the initial brief for Williams’ second sentencing, due to a reconstruction of the record on appeal in the Trial Court.

    Case Information:

    On 01/10/97, Ronnie K. Williams filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court citing the following trial court issues: (1) the trial court reversibly erred in placing alternate juror Caril on the jury after deliberation had begun, (2) it was fundamental error to interfere with jury deliberations by removing juror Wallace without conducting an adequate inquiry that would justify such a removal, (3) appellant was denied due process and a fair trial by the trial court’s instruction placing undue prominence on the jury’s notes, (4) the trial court erred in failing to hold an adequate inquiry into the impact of defense counsel’s bipolar illness on appellant’s right to a fair trial, (5) the appellant did not waive his right to conflict-free counsel, and thus his rights under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated, (6) the appellant was un-represented by counsel during a crucial proceeding and thus his rights under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated, (7) the trial court erred in allowing into evidence that Lisa Dyke was pregnant where the probative value of such evidence was substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, (8) the trial court erred by not being present during the testimony of a state witness*, (9) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on felony murder with sexual battery as the underlying felony and on the aggravating circumstance that the offense occurred during a sexual battery because there was insufficient evidence to prove sexual battery, (10) the trial court erred in denying appellant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the state failed to prove the element of premeditation, (11) the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument deprived appellant of due process and a fair trial, (12) the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce the hearsay statements made to Officer Gillespie, (13) the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce hearsay statements made by Lisa Dyke during a 911 call and at the hospital, (14) it was fundamental error to constructively amend the indictment contrary to the Grand Jury Clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions, (15) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to proceed on a theory of felony murder when the indictment gave no notice of the theory, (16) the trial court erred in using indecent assault as the prior violent felony aggravating circumstance, (17) the sentence of death must be vacated and the sentence reduced to life where the trial court failed to make the findings required for the death penalty, (18) the death penalty is not proportionally warranted, (19) the trial court erred in allowing the evidence concerning the prior violent felony to become a feature of the case, (20) the trial court erred in finding that the killing was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, and (21) the jury instructions stating that the jury is to only consider mitigation after it is reasonably convinced of its existence is improper.

    *During the presentation of evidence concerning bite marks found on the victim, the trial judge was sitting behind a screen and, although he could hear testimony, he could not see the slides, etc., that were being presented as evidence.

    On 07/12/01, the Florida Supreme Court vacated the defendant’s convictions and sentences and remanded the case to the trial court. On 09/21/01, the Florida Supreme court issued a mandate for the case.

    On 05/17/04, with regard to his retrial, Williams filed a Direct Appeal with the Florida Supreme Court citing the following trial court issues: (1) the trial court erred in admitting Lisa Dyke’s out-of-court statements into evidence, (2) the trial court’s departure from neutrality deprived appellant of due process and a fair trial, (3) the trial court erred in allowing the jury to use a transcript of the 911 tape created by the state that was not in evidence, (4) the trial court erred in allowing in evidence that Lisa Dyke was pregnant where such evidence was irrelevant and any relevancy was substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, (5) it was fundamental error to submit a felony-murder case to the jury where the undisputed evidence refuted that the death occurred during the commission of a felony, (6) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on felony murder with sexual battery as the underlying felony and on the aggravating circumstance that the offense occurred during a sexual battery as there was insufficient evidence to prove sexual battery, (7) the trial court erred in admitting the conclusion that Lisa Dyke had been raped, (8) the trial court erred in denying appellant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the state failed to prove the element of premeditation, (9) it was fundamental error to constructively amend the indictment contrary to the Grand Jury Clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions, (10) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to proceed on a theory of felony-murder when the indictment gave no notice of the theory, (11) it was reversible error to fail to give an instruction on the presumption of innocence as to felony murder, (12) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that it must reach a unanimous verdict finding of either premeditated or felony-murder in order to convict of murder in the first degree, (13) the appellant was denied his right to a reliable capital sentencing and due process by the failure to instruct that the fact-finder must determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances, (14) that instructing the jury to determine whether sufficient mitigating circumstances exist that outweigh aggravating circumstances places a higher burden of persuasion on the appellant, violates the Eighth Amendment requirement that death be the appropriate punishment, and violates fundamental fairness and due process, (15) the trial court erred in finding that the killing was cold, calculated, and premeditated, (16) the sentence of death must be vacated and the sentence reduced to life where the trial court failed to make the findings required for the death penalty, (17) the jury instructions stating the jury is to only consider mitigation after it is reasonably convinced of its existence is improper, (18) the trial court erred in using indecent assault as the prior violent felony aggravating circumstance, (19) the trial court erred in finding that the killing was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, (20) the death penalty is not proportionally warranted, (21) Florida’s Death Penalty Statute is unconstitutional where one is eligible for the death penalty by being convicted for violating section 782.04 of the Florida Statutes, and (22) to determine whether Florida’s Death Penalty Statute is unconstitutional under Ring v Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) or Furman v Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 313 (1972).

    On 06/21/07, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s disposition. On 07/05/07, Williams filed a Motion for Rehearing, which was denied on 10/18/07. On 11/05/07, the Florida Supreme Court issued a mandate.

    On 01/11/08, Williams filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. This petition was denied on 03/24/08.

    On 03/12/09, Williams filed a 3.851 Motion in the Circuit Court. This motion is currently pending and was amended on 04/08/11.

  3. #3
    Senior Member CnCP Legend Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,795
    U.S. Supreme Court rules Florida death penalty system is unconstitutional

    WASHINGTON — The process Florida has used for more than 40 years to sentence people to death was struck down Tuesday by the U.S. Supreme Court because it gives judges — rather than juries — too much power to decide whether killers should be executed.

    The 8-1 ruling said that the state's death-penalty sentencing procedure is flawed because juries play only an advisory role in recommending capital sentences. Florida is one of only three states that allow judges to override a jury's suggested sentence after reviewing additional evidence and hearing more aguments.

    A jury's "mere recommendation is not enough," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the court. "The Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death."

    The high court was overruling previous decisions upholding the state's sentencing process, she said.

    It was not immediately clear how Tuesday's ruling would affect the 385 men and five women currently awaiting execution on Florida's death row. Of those death row inmates, 29 are from Miami-Dade County, 23 are from Broward County and seven are from Palm Beach County.

    Florida has the second highest number of people on death row in the nation, behind California.

    A Florida judge has not overriden a jury's recommended life sentence and instead imposed death since 1999.

    Broward prosecutors on Tuesday were working to figure out how many pending cases the ruling might affect and in what way.

    "In all honesty, we're still analyzing the decision," said Assistant State Attorney Carolyn McCann, who handles appeals for the Broward office. "At this point, it is unclear what impact the decision will have on our cases."

    In Palm Beach County, it's been more than 17 years since someone was sentenced to the death penalty in state court. There are more than a half-dozen pending death penalty prosecutions in the county.

    When Margaret Dyke learned Tuesday that Ronnie Keith Williams' death sentence for fatally stabbing her 18-year-old pregnant daughter in Wilton Manors in 1993 might get put on hold, she collapsed into tears.

    "Father God, hear me, they cannot get away with this," she cried. "I want to put it behind me and not keep lingering at my side."

    Williams killed Lisa Dyke eight months after his release from prison for the 1984 stabbing death of another woman. He was sentenced to 17 years for slaying the 21-year-old but served only seven because of prison overcrowding.

    "My family is going to be heartbroken when I tell them this," said Margaret Dyke, 61, of Fort Lauderdale. "This broke my heart today. That was my only daughter, my child. That's wrong. It's wrong to make a mother go through this. He's an animal, a freaking animal."

    A Broward jury in 1996 convicted Williams of murdering Lisa Dyke and voted 11-1 to recommend his execution. A juror's emotional collapse prompted a re-trial. It took that jury just 15 minutes of deliberations in 2004 to decide 10-2 that Williams should be put to death.

    Attorney Bruce Rogow, an expert in constitutional law and retired professor at Nova Southeastern University, said there was "no surprise" in the high court's decision.

    Florida's system, Rogow said, "really took from the jury the ultimate decision."

    "If you see this in its larger sphere, it is part of the march towards doing away with the death penalty," Rogow said. "There's no question that at some point in the future, the death penalty will be a relic of our legal past."

    There is not a whole lot that has to be done to bring Florida's death penalty statute into compliance, Rogow said.

    "Clearly the judicial override is dead," Rogow said. "The Legislature will have to adjust the statute to make it clear that the judge does not make the findings."

    News of the Supreme Court's decision stunned Florida legislators. Florida House Speaker Steve Crisafulli, who learned of the ruling while he was giving a speech on opening day of the state's annual legislative session, said the Supreme Court had "impeccable timing."

    House legal experts immediately would begin to review the ruling, Crisafulli said.

    "I'm not aware of everything that was put out in the ruling but we will certainly have our judiciary team look at it and see what we need to do," said Crisafulli, R-Merritt Island.

    Rep. Matt Gaetz, an attorney who has dealt with capital punishment during his legislative career, predicted that Florida legislators would act swiftly to get the death penalty "right back on track."

    The Department of Corrections had no immediate response to the ruling. Neither did Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

    In Tallahassee, Rep. Jose Javier Rodriguez, D-Miami, is sponsoring a bill which would require a unanimous jury vote in death penalty cases.

    "For decades we've known that there are problems with our capital sentencing scheme," Rodriguez said. The Supreme Court's decision "means we can fix our death penalty if the political will is there."

    The high court sided with Timothy Lee Hurst, who was convicted of the 1998 murder of his manager at a Popeye's restaurant in Pensacola. A jury divided 7-5 in favor of death, but a judge imposed the sentence.

    Florida's solicitor general argued that the system was acceptable because a jury first decides if the defendant is eligible for the death penalty.

    The high court justices sent the case back to the Florida Supreme Court to determine whether the error in sentencing Hurst was harmless, or whether he should get a new sentencing hearing.

    The lone dissenter, Justice Samuel Alito, said trial judges in Florida simply perform a reviewing function that duplicates what the jury has done.

    Under Florida law, the state requires juries in capital sentencing hearings to weigh factors for and against imposing a death sentence. But the judge is not bound by those findings and can reach a different conclusion. The judge can also weigh other factors independently. So a jury could base its decision on one particular aggravating factor, but a judge could then rely on a different factor the jury never considered.

    In Hurst's case, prosecutors asked the jury to consider two aggravating factors: the murder was committed during a robbery and it was "especially heinous, atrocious or cruel." But Florida law did not require the jury to say how it voted on each factor. Hurst's attorney argued that it was possible only four jurors agreed with one, while three agreed with the other.

    Sotomayor said Florida's system is flawed because it allows a sentencing judge to find aggravating factors "independent of a jury's fact finding."

    The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that a defendant has the right to have a jury decide whether the circumstances of a crime warrant a sentence of death.

    Florida is one of only three states that do not require a unanimous jury verdict when sentencing someone to death. The others are Alabama and Delaware.

    The justices' decision comes less than a week after Florida's most recent execution. Oscar Ray Bolin was put to death by lethal injection Jan. 7 for his 1986 conviction in the abduction and killing of a 26-year-old woman in Pasco County just north of Tampa.

    A day later, Gov. Rick Scott signed the death warrant of Mark Asay, whose execution is scheduled for March 17. He would be be the 24th death row inmate put to death under Scott, padding his lead as the all-time execution leader among Florida governors, a title he took from previous record holder Jeb Bush with 21.

    Asay would be the third inmate executed this year. Michael Ray Lambrix, who has spent 31 years on Death Row, is scheduled to be executed on Feb. 11.

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/flo...112-story.html
    "There is a point in the history of a society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that among other things it sides even with those who harm it, criminals, and does this quite seriously and honestly. Punishing somehow seems unfair to it, and it is certain that imagining ‘punishment’ and ‘being supposed to punish’ hurts it, arouses fear in it." Friedrich Nietzsche

  4. #4
    Senior Member CnCP Legend Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,795
    Brain-damaged man born to fatally wounded mom dies at age 23

    FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) -- A man who was born with brain damage after his pregnant teen mother was fatally stabbed has died 23 years after the attack.

    The South Florida Sun Sentinel reports 23-year-old Julius Dyke died Sunday.

    After Dyke's mother, Lisa, suffered severe stab wounds in January 1993, doctors rushed to save her unborn son.

    Julius Dyke was born with brain damage and was never able to walk or talk.

    He was confined to a bed in his grandmother's South Florida home where she took care of him.

    Lisa Dyke died 18 days after Julius was born. Her attacker, Ronnie Keith Williams, is on Florida's death row.

    Authorities say Williams attacked Dykes when he came to an apartment where she was babysitting, looking for his ex-girlfriend.

    http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Brai...405040785.html
    "There is a point in the history of a society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that among other things it sides even with those who harm it, criminals, and does this quite seriously and honestly. Punishing somehow seems unfair to it, and it is certain that imagining ‘punishment’ and ‘being supposed to punish’ hurts it, arouses fear in it." Friedrich Nietzsche

  5. #5
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014



    Death row inmate could face new charges in second death linked to 1993 attack

    By Lisa J. Huriash
    The Sun-Sentinel

    Ronnie Keith Williams has been convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of a pregnant woman 23 years ago. Now, prosecutors will review the possibility of new charges against him in the recent death of the victim’s son.

    Two days after the fatal attack on her in 1993, Lisa Dyke’s baby was delivered. But Julius Dyke, who suffered brain damage, spent his whole life unable to walk or talk, and needed tubes to help him breathe and eat.

    When Julius died earlier this month at 23, the medical examiner ruled his death a homicide. He died from delayed complications of cerebral palsy, with a contributory cause of “inflicted maternal trauma,” the Broward Medical Examiner’s Office said Thursday.

    Of the possibility of new charges against Williams, who is already on death row, Broward State Attorney’s Office spokesman Ron Ishoy would say only, “We have the matter under review.”

    Lisa Dyke’s brother, Theo Dyke of Fort Lauderdale, said the family wants Williams prosecuted for Julius’ death. “Because of Ronnie, Julius was in the condition he was in,” Theo Dyke said.

    But the decision for prosecutors may not be so clear-cut, said criminal defense attorney and former Broward homicide prosecutor Ken Padowitz. Whether to pursue a case against somebody already sentenced to death is a dilemma, said Padowitz, who is not involved in the case.

    On one hand, “this is what you have to balance: What is the cost to society, manpower in time, in taking attention away from their cases?”

    Transferring Williams out of a secure state prison to be taken back into a Broward courtroom means making sure he doesn’t try to escape, Padowitz said. There is a “security risk for an individual on death row” who “would do anything to escape that predicament,” he said.

    But on the other hand, there’s the issue of “justice for a child, a human being, a family,” Padowitz said. “If you violate the rules of law, people expect the government will prosecute ... and mete out an appropriate sentence.

    “I don’t know if there is a clear answer here.”

    Williams attacked 18-year-old Lisashante “Lisa” Dyke on Jan. 26, 1993, when she was baby-sitting for a friend in Wilton Manors.

    Police said Williams stabbed her repeatedly in her chest and back with a 15-inch knife, and bit her on her back, breasts and buttocks. They said Dyke identified Williams to a 911 operator and again on her hospital deathbed by pointing him out in a photo lineup. She died Feb. 14, 1993.

    As Julius aged, he spent his days in bed in his grandmother’s house, under her eagle eye, often with the television on in the background.

    His grandmother, Margaret Dyke, became his most fierce advocate and considered him an extension of her only daughter. “I feel like I’m taking my daughter home again,” she told the Sun Sentinel in March 1993 when she brought Julius home from the hospital.

    In 2004, a Broward jury found Williams guilty of first-degree murder, rejecting his defense that he was too drunk on vodka and high on cocaine to have planned the attack.

    The same jury recommended he receive the death penalty. He has remained on death row since.

    David Jones, who is now retired, handled dozens of murder cases during his career at the Wilton Manors Police Department. But he said Lisa Dyke’s case, which he helped investigate, sticks out in his memory. “It was brutal, just brutal,” he said.

    “He needs to be held accountable,” Jones said of Williams. “She was eight months pregnant. She would have delivered a nice healthy baby boy if not for him,” Jones said. “He had total disregard for her and her unborn child.”

    Jones said he thinks prosecutors should pursue the new charges against Williams despite the cost.

    “This is an unborn child who was damaged and spent his life not knowing he even existed; 23 years of brutality inflicted on him.”

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/br...223-story.html

  6. #6
    Administrator Aaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    New Jersey, unfortunately
    Posts
    4,382
    Death sentence vacated by the Florida Supreme Court today due to Hurst and Mosley.

    http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d.../sc13-1472.pdf
    Don't ask questions, just consume product and then get excited for next products.

    "They will hurt you. They will hurt your grandma, these people. The root cause of this is there's no discipline in the homes, they don't go to school, you know, they live off the government, no personal accountability, and they just beat people up for no reason, and it's disgusting." - Former Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters

  7. #7
    Administrator Helen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    20,875
    He killed a pregnant woman in 1993. Now, he’ll be charged in the death of her son

    By Lisa J. Huriash
    The Sun-Sentinel

    Ronnie Keith Williams sits on death row, convicted of stabbing a pregnant woman to death in 1993.

    Now, authorities will again charge him with murder, this time for the death of the victim’s son, the Broward County prosecutor’s office said Thursday.

    Julius Dyke was born by Caesarean section two days after his mother, Lisa Dyke, was stabbed. He suffered brain damage because of his mother's wounds.

    So when 23-year-old Julius died in 2016, it was ruled a homicide linked to the attack.

    Julius Dyke’s grandmother, Margaret Dyke, began to wail Thursday after learning prosecutors will charge Williams with first-degree murder in Julius’ death.

    Prosecutors told her a grand jury found probable cause to file charges, she said. “Oh my Julius, my love,” she said.

    Williams attacked 18-year-old Lisa Dyke when she was baby-sitting for a friend in Wilton Manors. She was in the kitchen making toast when Williams came looking for somebody else.

    Police said Williams stabbed her repeatedly in her chest and back with a 15-inch knife, and bit her on her back, breasts and buttocks.

    After his birth, Julius Dyke spent a lifetime confined to his bed, never able to walk or talk. He ate through a feeding tube. Margaret Dyke was his caretaker.

    “I miss him dearly. I thirst for him like I thirst for water,” she said. “Now I truly miss my daughter because the only part of her has gone on with her.”

    Margaret Dyke said the killer “took two innocent lives, and completely destroyed mine.”

    At the time of Lisa Dyke's death, Williams was fresh out of prison for the 1984 murder of 21-year-old Gaynell Jeffrey of Fort Lauderdale, who was stabbed to death at her home and then dumped in an abandoned field.

    In 2004, a Broward jury found Williams guilty of first-degree murder in Lisa Dykes' death.

    The same jury decided by a 10-2 vote that Williams should be put to death. But in 2016, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty cannot be imposed without the unanimous support of a jury.

    Williams is one of nearly a dozen cases in Broward that have to come back to trial for a new sentencing phase, said Constance Simmons, Broward State Attorney's Office spokeswoman. The Supreme Court mandate is for the penalty phase of the trial — not the entire trial.

    She said prosecutors will again seek the death penalty for the murder of Lisa Dyke. Prosecutors haven’t decided whether they’ll seek the death penalty in the Julius Dyke case.

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/br...517-story.html
    "I realize this may sound harsh, but as a father and former lawman, I really don't care if it's by lethal injection, by the electric chair, firing squad, hanging, the guillotine or being fed to the lions."
    - Oklahoma Rep. Mike Christian

    "There are some people who just do not deserve to live,"
    - Rev. Richard Hawke

    “There are lots of extremely smug and self-satisfied people in what would be deemed lower down in society, who also deserve to be pulled up. In a proper free society, you should be allowed to make jokes about absolutely anything.”
    - Rowan Atkinson

  8. #8
    Senior Member CnCP Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    2,243
    Williams was resentenced to life:

    https://fdc.myflorida.com/offenderSe...&TypeSearch=AI

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •