Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Robert J. Ybarra, Jr. - Nevada Death Row

  1. #21
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    Lawyer for Ely killer critic of NV judge elections

    Robert Ybarra was arrested for the murder of Nancy Griffith in 1979 because the 15-year-old high school student survived long enough to identify him for police after he raped her, doused her in gasoline, lit her on fire and left her for dead near a trailer park north of Ely about 50 miles from the Utah line.

    Sentenced to death 32 years ago, perhaps the most vilified man ever to pass through White Pine County still stirs strong reaction in the community. To this day, the local Historical and Archaeological Society devotes a considerable section of its website to "Nancy Griffith's Heinous Murder."

    "Mr. Ybarra's case is the most notorious in the history of White Pine County," public defender Michael Pescetta said. "Memories of the offense have not faded."

    It's that notoriety and the community's near universal loathing of Ybarra that Pescetta is trying to capitalize on to spare the killer's life.

    Pescetta argues in his latest petitions in U.S. District Court in Reno that it's impossible for anyone accused of such a reprehensible killing to get a fair trial in Nevada because the state's judges are beholden to voters who won't tolerate jurists they view as soft on crime, especially in high-profile murders.

    It's especially a problem, he said, in smaller communities where everybody knows everybody and where letters to the editor at the Ely Times suggest things such as: "The only way to execute Ybarra is to get some of the poorest archers and have them shoot blunt point arrows at him until his execution is completed."

    "The entire fabric of the community in White Pine County is so hostile to Mr. Ybarra that any local judge would simply destroy his career by ruling in Mr. Ybarra's favor," Pescetta wrote in a supplemental filing Jan. 14 questioning the impact of judicial elections on such cases.

    Twice denied review by the U.S. Supreme Court, Ybarra's appeals over the years have focused on whether he's legally mentally disabled and can't be killed because of the high court's ruling in Virginia in 2002 that concluded executing such defendants is cruel and unusual punishment prohibited under the Constitution.

    The appeals are aimed at removing him from death row, not keep him from spending the rest of his life in prison, Pescetta said. He said he wasn't familiar with the election argument being advanced in other states.

    Robert Wieland, Nevada's senior deputy attorney general handling the appeal on behalf of the state, declined to discuss the case.

    "I prefer to try my cases in the courtroom," he told The Associated Press. He argues in court papers that it's too late for Ybarra's lawyers to raise a new legal argument. He said they never mentioned it in two previous appeals at the state level or three in federal court.

    "Ybarra waited quite literally years to make the argument ... (which) merely reflects his disagreement with this court's order and such disagreement is not a basis upon which relief can be granted," Wieland wrote.

    Pescetta counters that it's not a new argument, rather it's a basis to reconsider past rulings denying Ybarra's status as mentally disabled because it's a special situation — namely a capital case with an elected judge — where the federal government cannot show its usual deference defer to state court rulings without violating his equal protection rights under U.S. law.

    "The district court could not be expected to be impartial," Pescetta said. "Nevada law does not include any mechanism for insulating state judges and justices from majoritarian pressures which would affect the impartiality of an 'an average person' as a judge in a capital case."

    In Nevada, members of the bench, including justices of the peace, state court judges and even justices on the Nevada Supreme Court, are elected. Nevada voters have rejected ballot measures that would have moved away from the general election of judges three times since 1972, most recently in 2010 by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent.

    Janine Hansen, president of the Nevada Families Eagle Forum and national committee woman for the Independent American Party, was among those who testified before the state Senate against the last ballot measure. She said it might have made sense to switch judges for Ybarra's case but that's no reason to do away with judicial elections.

    "This is a government that is supposed to be of the people, for the people, by the people," Hansen said Thursday. "We have a better chance being judged correctly by someone determined by the will of the people."

    About half the U.S. states currently use some form of election to either pick or retain judges, but it's difficult to pinpoint the number because of the variety of combinations of methods used, said Betsy Adeboyejo, a spokeswoman for the American Bar Association in Washington.

    Mary Celeste, a Denver (Colo.) County judge and past president of the American Judges Association, counted 22 states that were using some form of elections to select judges in 2010 based primarily on the argument that it makes them more accountable to the public.

    "Electing judges is seen as consistent with our democratic ideals, allowing voters to maintain the independence of the judicial branch by taking appoint influence away from the other two branches" of government, she said.

    At Ybarra's six-monthlong trial in 1981, public defenders were denied motions for a change of venue as well as removal of the judge even though he provided legal representation to members of Griffith's family when he was in private practice.

    Judge Steve Dobrescu acknowledged he helped Griffith's parents prepare a will and represented her sister in an adoption proceeding.

    But he argued that in such a small rural county (population of about 7,000 at the time) it would be impossible to find many people who wouldn't have known the girl or her family and even harder to find someone who did not have relatives who had been represented by a district judge when the judge was in private practice. He said disqualification would mean that "every high profile case would have to be heard by a visiting or senior judge."

    During jury selection, Pescetta said, "it turned out that, yes, it is quite true that everybody does know everybody."

    But he said that's all the more reason that a judge in such a community should not be subject to the whims of voters.

    "This is a very tragic case in a lot of ways," Pescetta said in an interview this week from Las Vegas. "And whether this sort of problem is tolerable in civil cases is an issue I don't have to think about. But when it is a capital case and we're putting someone to death, we need to be a little more anxious about it."

    http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/art...#ixzz2LBlZYlc9
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  2. #22
    xco
    Guest
    besides the brutal slaying of Nancy the only tragic thing about this case is that Ybarra is still breathing, on the day that this SOB takes his last breath, will be the day that the citizens of White Pine County can finally breath a sigh of relief, shed a final tear for their slain child, and thank God that there is finally justice for her.

  3. #23
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On November 14, 2013, an appeal was filed before the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cir...s/ca9/13-17326

  4. #24
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On June 21, 2016, oral argument will be heard before the Ninth Circuit in Ybarra's appeal of the district court's denial of his motions to reopen his habeas corpus petition. The panel will be made up of Judges Silverman (Clinton), Tallman (Clinton) and Clifton (G.W. Bush).

    http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar...1,22&year=2016

  5. #25
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Oral argument will now be heard on July 21, 2017. The panel will be made up of Judges Bea (G.W. Bush), N.R. Smith (G.W. Bush) and Robreno (G.H.W. Bush). Ybarra's really suffered a stroke of misfortune with this panel given how Democrats predominate on the Ninth Circuit.

    https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calenda...2021&year=2017

  6. #26
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Hmm, his panel's now been changed--to his benefit I think. The judges are now Judges Silverman (Clinton), Tallman (Clinton) and Clifton (G.W. Bush).

    https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calenda...2021&year=2017

  7. #27
    Moderator Dave from Florida's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    810
    Every case is different but Silverman & Tallman often vote with the state. I have seen Clifton vote with the prisoner several times.

  8. #28
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    You're right and Clifton voted against the President's 90-day travel ban as well.

  9. #29
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    In today's opinions, the Ninth Circuit REMANDED Ybarra's habeas case to Federal District Court on an Atkins claim.

    http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastor...1/13-17326.pdf

  10. #30
    Moderator Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,316
    Distributed for conference June 25, 2020.

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....c/19-8239.html
    Thank you for the adventure - Axol

    Tried so hard and got so far, but in the end it doesn’t even matter - Linkin Park

    Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired. My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever. - Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt

    I’m going to the ghost McDonalds - Garcello

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •