Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,931

    Jonathan Lee Gentry - Washington Death Row


    Cassie Holden




    Facts of the Crime:

    Convicted of killing Cassie Holden, a 12-year-old girl from Pocatello, Idaho who was visiting her mother in Bremerton in June 1988. An autopsy found she had been beaten with a large rock.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,931
    September 19, 2008

    Washington's longest-serving death-row inmate loses latest appeal

    A federal judge has rejected the latest appeal by Washington's longest-serving death-row inmate, Jonathan Lee Gentry, turning aside allegations of police and prosecutor misconduct and nearly a dozen other claims that he didn't receive a fair trial.

    A federal judge has rejected the latest appeal by Washington's longest-serving death-row inmate, Jonathan Lee Gentry, turning aside allegations of police and prosecutor misconduct and nearly a dozen other claims that he hadn't received a fair trial.

    Gentry, 52, has been on death row since 1991, when he was convicted of raping and killing a 12-year-old girl in Bremerton. On Monday in Seattle, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled on a petition filed by Gentry's attorneys in 1999.

    But the judge has given Gentry's attorneys until next month to ask him to reconsider portions of his ruling, and Gentry's lawyer promised to pursue the case into the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Assistant Attorney General Paul Weisser said Gentry's case will likely take "at least two more years" in appeals.

    "These are difficult cases, and we know this process is a lengthy one," Weisser said. "We can't afford to get frustrated now."

    Lasnik, in a separate ruling earlier this month, found that the Kitsap County Prosecuting Attorney's Office knowingly withheld evidence and elicited false testimony from at least one jailhouse snitch in the case. The judge found, however, that taken in context with other, damning evidence, the issue didn't prejudice Gentry enough to grant him a new trial or throw out the death penalty.

    "We are greatly disappointed ... that the judge didn't find reversible error," said Gentry's appellate attorney, Scott Engelhard. "We believe the conviction should be overturned."

    Gentry was convicted of killing Cassie Holden, a Pocatello, Idaho, girl who was visiting her mother in Bremerton in June 1988. An autopsy found she'd been beaten with a large rock.

    Witnesses reported seeing a black man in the area, and Gentry, who is black, had a long criminal history and quickly came under suspicion after he was arrested for the knife-point rape of another young woman in Kitsap County.

    He was charged with Holden's murder after hair and blood on his shoelaces linked him to the crime.

    In January 1995, the state Supreme Court upheld Gentry's death sentence in a 6-3 decision. Later that year, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request by Gentry for a hearing on his appeal to overturn his conviction.

    In February 1999, the state Supreme Court again upheld Gentry's death sentence. In a 7-2 decision, the court said, "Gentry has not provided us any reasons to re-examine issues we previously resolved in direct review. Moreover, he has not demonstrated the existence of new issues" to examine.

    Gentry has been on death row for 18 years, tying a record set by Mitchell Rupe, whose aggravated-murder conviction was later overturned, partly because a federal judge decided hanging a person of his weight would result in cruel and unusual punishment by raising the risk of decapitation. Rupe, who weighed 410 pounds, died in prison in February 2006 after a lengthy battle with liver disease.

    The last person to be executed in Washington state was James Elledge, 58, in August 2001 for the 1998 strangling and stabbing of Eloise Jane Fitzner, 47, at a Lynnwood church.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...entry18m0.html

  3. #3
    Administrator
    Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,631
    On June 8, 2010, Gentry filed an appeal in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit over the denial of his habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    http://atg.wa.gov/DeathPenaltyCase/2...usReports.aspx

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,117
    JONATHAN GENTRY V. STEPHEN SINCLAIR

    In today's Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinions, Gentry's petition for writ of habeas corpus was DENIED.
    A uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,631
    On the three-member panel that has unanimously upheld Gentry's death sentence, there were one Bush appointee and two Clinton appointees, one of whom was Baez, who almost never upholds death sentences.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    MRBAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Capital Region NY
    Posts
    792
    Does WA follow any guidlines as to how long it might be before they schedule an X date ?

  7. #7
    Administrator
    Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,117
    JONATHAN GENTRY V. STEPHEN SINCLAIR

    In today's Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinions, Gentry's petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed October 2, 2012, was DENIED.
    A uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Shep3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Atlanta ga
    Posts
    115
    How long will SCOTUS take and is the new governor pro or anti?

  9. #9
    Administrator
    Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,117
    Prosecutor accused of racial bias in new appeal for Washington Death Row inmate

    An attorney for Jonathan Lee Gentry, Washington’s longest-sitting death-row inmate, asked the state Supreme Court on Tuesday for a new trial on the basis of racially charged prosecutorial misconduct.

    Gentry, 56, has been on death row since 1991, when he was convicted of killing 12-year-old Cassie Holden, of Pocatello, Idaho, who was visiting her mother in Bremerton in June 1988. An autopsy found Holden had been beaten with a large rock.

    Witnesses had reported seeing a black man matching Gentry’s description in the area. Gentry, who had a long criminal history, was arrested in the knife-point rape of another young woman in Kitsap County and was then linked to Holden’s death by hair and blood found on his shoelaces.

    Tuesday marked the third time the case has been brought before Washington’s court of last resort. In January 1995, the court upheld Gentry’s death sentence in a 6-3 decision. Later that year, it denied Gentry’s appeal to overturn his conviction.

    Four years later, the court again upheld Gentry’s death sentence, in a 7-2 decision.

    On Tuesday, Tim Ford, Gentry’s attorney, asked the court to take another look, focusing on then-Kitsap County Prosecutor Danny Clem’s comment to Gentry’s African-American trial lawyer during a courtroom break: “Where’d you get your ethics, in Harlem?”

    The trial court found the remark to be “totally inappropriate” and “racially offensive,” but not grounds to halt the prosecution.

    Ford relied on a 2-year-old standard set by the state Supreme Court, arguing that Clem’s remark displayed prejudice on the prosecution’s part and constituted grounds for the case to be retried.

    “When somebody says something like that ... you can’t assume that they’re going to act in an evenhanded manner when they’re making a decision, particularly an emotional and difficult decision such as the decision to seek the death penalty,” Ford told the justices. Furthermore, he said, witnesses for the prosecution used epithets — including the N-word — that evoked racial bias in the trial.

    Ford urged the court to follow the new standard established in a case called State v. Monday — a June 2011 ruling that held that the prosecution bears the burden of proving that racially based prosecutorial misconduct didn’t affect the outcome of the case.

    In that case, the Supreme Court reversed a King County murder conviction and ordered a new trial because, it said, a prosecutor improperly cast doubt on the credibility of the witnesses based on their race. The court said the prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the impropriety didn’t affect the jury.

    How the Supreme Court decides to interpret the State v. Monday ruling with respect to Gentry’s case will likely determine the outcome.

    Ford said it should be retroactively applied to the 1991 case, and the burden to prove that racially based prosecutorial misconduct didn’t weigh on the outcome should be shifted to the prosecution — especially because, in a death-penalty sentence, the stakes are higher.

    “Everybody talks about racial discrimination,” Ford said. “But, in Monday, this court did something about it. ... If you compare the approach that this court took with this case in 1995 to the approach it took in Monday, it shows a dramatic difference.”

    Kitsap County Deputy Prosecutor Randall Sutton said the Monday case ruling shouldn’t come into play. He made a point of condemning Clem’s comments, but argued that they hadn’t tainted the trial in the way the misconduct had in the Monday case.

    “Despite the fact that [Gentry’s attorney has] taken Mr. Clem’s comments and attempted to paint that brush all over this trial, Mr. Clem wasn’t even the trial prosecutor in this case,” Sutton said in his rebuttal. “There’s no evidence whatsoever either of the trial prosecutors harbored any racial bias toward Mr. Gentry or anyone else. There is no evidence.”

    Sutton admitted he’d never met Clem but had heard him described as a “hotheaded jerk.” Nevertheless, he argued, Clem’s comments were made out of the presence of the judge and the jury. Because they weren’t directly part of the trial, he said, they don’t fall under the jurisdiction of the Monday ruling.

    “I’m not in any way trying to justify his statement, because I don’t believe it is justifiable,” he said. “But the fact is, Monday is about the fairness of the trial and the perception and the effect on the jury. There is nothing in this case that the jury heard or saw or was even motivated by the state to present to the jury that suggests that racial bias was involved.”

    Sutton also said evidence in the defense’s brief had been “grossly taken out of context.” He referenced testimony identifying Gentry as looking “out of place” on the day of the murder and said it was based on what he was wearing — a suit on a hot day — not on his race. He added that Gentry’s race only came up in the trial during a line of questioning that included other physical characteristics, such as height, weight, eye color and clothing.

    In response to questioning from the justices, Ford said the Monday precedent ought to be retroactively applied to every criminal conviction, especially in capital-punishment cases, since the stakes and the responsibility of review are higher.

    “I think most people would think that if there’s a reasonable doubt the person was sentenced to death because of their race, they shouldn’t be put to death,” Ford said in an interview after the hearing. “That seems like a pretty simple proposition, but in court, sometimes it can get pretty complicated.”

    http://seattletimes.com/html/localne...appealxml.html
    A uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Stro07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    512
    In today's United States Supreme Court orders, Gentry's petition for a writ of certiorari was DENIED.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...s/12-10321.htm

    If Cal Brown's execution is any guide, a December execution date could follow.
    Last edited by Stro07; 10-07-2013 at 11:10 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •