izmir escort izmir escort antalya escort porno jigolo izmir escort bursa escort porno izle türk porno havalandırma sistemleri porno izle takipçi satın al youtube haberleri alsancak escort bursa escort bursa escort gaziantep escort denizli escort izmir escort istanbul escort istanbul escort istanbul escort izmir escort
Wesley Ira Purkey - Federal Execution - July 15, 2020 - Page 4
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: Wesley Ira Purkey - Federal Execution - July 15, 2020

  1. #31
    Senior Member Frequent Poster schmutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    357
    For an execution to be punishment, as opposed to merely killing, the condemned must know he is about to die and why. This does not change the matter of guilt, as it is not a defense against the charges brought, but a condition that can proscribe execution of a sentence on the basis that it is no longer punitive in nature.

  2. #32
    Senior Member Frequent Poster Neil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    451
    Death row inmate seeks execution delay, says coronavirus endangers Buddhist priest

    KEVIN JOHNSON | USA TODAY |
    Referring to the resumption of federal executions in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic as "super-spreader events," lawyers for one of three inmates slated to die later this month argued for a delay Thursday, claiming that the deadly virus would endanger the life of his spiritual adviser who would be attending.
    The lawsuit, filed on behalf of a Buddhist priest who has ministered to condemned inmate Wesley Purkey, argues that the pandemic would risk the health of Rev. Seigen Hartkemeyer who is "religiously obligated" to attend Purkey's July 15 execution.

    Purkey’s execution is the second of three that the government has scheduled in quick succession later this month, marking a resumption of the federal death penalty following a 17-year hiatus.

    “The fact that the federal government has scheduled these executions now, during a pandemic when COVID-19 cases are surging around the country, is appalling,” said Cassandra Stubbs, director of the ACLU’s Capital Punishment Project. “Nine of the top 10 hot spots for COVID-19 are in prisons. Asking hundreds of people from around the country to go to Indiana right now to attend this execution is like asking them to run into a burning building. We haven’t had a federal execution in 17 years: There is absolutely no reason for the government to rush forward with such a reckless and dangerous plan.”
    This week, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to resume federal executions when justices denied a challenge from four convicted murderers, including Purkey, who argued that federal executions must adhere to the specific protocols used by the states where each man was sentenced, including the method of execution.

    Attorney General William Barr announced last year that the federal government would conduct its first executions since 2003 using the single drug pentobarbital. The drug is used in many but not all states.

    Federal District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that the executions would conflict with provisions of a 1994 federal law, under which the federal government is supposed to follow protocols used by the states in which the prisoners were sentenced. That ruling was upheld by a three-judge federal appeals court panel.

    Lawyers for Purkey convicted in the 1998 kidnapping, rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl, raised the issue of the virus as the federal Bureau of Prisons has struggled to control its spread. So far, 90 inmates and one staffer have died, while 1,563 inmates and 164 staffers are infected.

    At the prison complex in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the federal death chamber is housed, one inmate has died and five inmates were infected.

    Purkey's lawyers asserted that Rev. Hartkemeyer, 68, has lung-related illnesses that "make him particularly vulnerable to COVID-19."The lawsuit claims that the timing of the execution, "forcing Rev. Hartkemeyer to risk his health and life to perform his religious duties as Purkey’s priest," violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...amp/5362696002
    Last edited by Neil123; 07-02-2020 at 11:16 AM.

  3. #33
    Administrator Aaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    New Jersey, unfortunately
    Posts
    3,125
    What the hell is it with white death row inmates and Buddhist conversions? It's to white inmates what Islam is to black inmates.
    "You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook." - Harry Truman

  4. #34
    Senior Member CnCP Addict Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    514
    I don’t think Purkey is actually Buddhist. He probably heard about the Patrick Murphy bs and decided to do it too
    I believe in the death penalty

    ~James Dobson

  5. #35
    Senior Member Frequent Poster Neil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    451
    If these federal executions don’t go through in two weeks this year we’ll have 10 executions. We’re definitely headed down that path of little to no executions this year. I see it.
    Last edited by Neil123; 07-02-2020 at 12:11 PM.

  6. #36
    Senior Member Member Mastro Titta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Prato, Italy
    Posts
    235
    Please, ban all religious advisors within 10 km from the death chamber. Enough with this charade.

  7. #37
    Senior Member CnCP Addict Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    514
    The Seventh Circuit has denied his habeas petition but they’ve temporarily stayed the execution until all issues are taken care of

    https://twitter.com/rdunhamdpic/stat...614011907?s=21
    I believe in the death penalty

    ~James Dobson

  8. #38
    Administrator Aaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    New Jersey, unfortunately
    Posts
    3,125
    It's my impression that the 7th Circuit stayed it simply because they could, without considering the likelihood of success on the merits. If so, SCOTUS will likely vacate this on appeal. A stay is not automatically available as a matter of right.

    But it is worrying that the panel had two Trump judges (Brennan, St. Eve) on it. St. Eve was a consensus pick but Brennan was a bitterly fought one.
    "You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook." - Harry Truman

  9. #39
    Senior Member Frequent Poster Fact's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    329
    I read the opinion--it was directly controlled by a CA7 en banc case from only a couple years ago. If Brennan and St. Eve had ruled against Purkey, that would be much more worrying because it would show that they ignore precedent.

  10. #40
    Senior Member Frequent Poster Neil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    451
    Is Barr going to be appealing this? That’s the question
    Last edited by Neil123; Yesterday at 03:18 PM.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •