Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 117

Thread: Lezmond Charles Mitchell - Federal Execution - August 26, 2020

  1. #1
    Administrator Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,515

    Lezmond Charles Mitchell - Federal Execution - August 26, 2020




    Summary of Offense:

    On October 28, 2001, Mitchell and his co-defendants (including a juvenile) allegedly got a ride from a woman, Alyce R. Slim, 63, and her granddaughter, Tiffany Lee, 9, in Arizona. They stabbed both victims to death and stole the car--supposedly for use in an armed robbery. Each victim was stabbed at a separate location. The Attorney General ordered a capital prosecution against Mitchell under a carjacking theory -- although the tribe has not "opted in" to the federal death penalty. Mitchell was found guilty on May 20, 2003 and sentenced to death on September 15, 2003.

  2. #2
    Administrator Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,515
    On May 22, 2009, Mitchell filed a habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    Source

  3. #3
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On September 30, 2010, Mitchell's habeas petition was DENIED in Federal District Court.

    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/ari...v08089/445486/

  4. #4
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On March 1, 2011, Mitchell filed an appeal in the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals over the denial of his habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cir.../ca9/11-99003/

  5. #5
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Oral argument was heard on February 20, 2014 in Mitchell's case before a Ninth Circuit panel made up of Judges Reinhardt (Carter), Silverman (Clinton) and Wardlaw (Clinton).

    http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar...s=20&year=2014

  6. #6
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    LEZMOND MITCHELL V. USA

    In today's opinions, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals AFFIRMED the district court's DENIAL of Mitchell's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging his convictions under the Major Crimes Act for multiple offenses committed on the Navajo reservation including two counts of first degree murder and multiple counts of robbery and his conviction and death sentence under the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 for carjacking resulting in death. Judge Reinhardt dissented as to Mitchell's death sentence.
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  7. #7
    Senior Member CnCP Legend FFM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,363
    Has Judge Reinhardt ever voted to uphold a death sentence, federal or otherwise?

  8. #8
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Yes, it was the Fernando Belmontes case out of California--on the fourth remand by the US Supreme Court.

  9. #9
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    Conviction, death sentence upheld in 2001 Navajo double-murder

    By Soyenixe Lopez
    Cronkite News

    WASHINGTON – An appeals court Friday upheld a federal death-row inmate’s conviction and sentence in the grisly 2001 beating and stabbing murders of a woman and her 9-year-old granddaughter on the Navajo Nation.

    Lezmond Mitchell had argued that defense attorneys at his trial and sentencing were ineffective, but the majority of a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed.

    The court said Mitchell’s attorneys were “thorough in the extreme” and had to make difficult choices to construct a defense in a crime of “unusual brutality.”

    But in a harsh dissent, Judge Stephen Reinhardt said Mitchell deserves a new sentencing hearing because the defense strategy of depicting him as a “good guy” to jurors was “no strategy at all.”

    Reinhardt said Mitchell was sentenced to death through a legal loophole and that “those with the greatest stake” in the case – the victims’ family and the Navajo Nation – all opposed Mitchell’s execution.

    Mitchell, 33, is the only Native American on the federal death row, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Reinhardt said Mitchell could “suffer the ignominious fate of becoming the first person to be executed for an intra-Indian crime that occurred in Indian country.”

    The case began when Mitchell, Johnny Orsinger and others plotted to steal a vehicle to use later to rob a trading post on the Navajo Nation. On Oct. 28, 2001, Mitchell and Orsinger abducted Alyce Slim, 63, and her 9-year-old granddaughter, in Slim’s GMC pickup truck.

    Court documents say that somewhere near Sawmill, the men stabbed Slim 33 times, killing her and dumping her in the back of the truck, where they forced the granddaughter to sit with the body.

    Some time later, they dragged Slim out of the truck and told the girl to “lay down and die,” when Mitchell cut her throat twice. When she did not die, both men dropped heavy rocks on her head, killing her.

    The two drove off, but returned a short time later to cover their tracks, burying their victims’ heads and hands in a hole and dragging their dismembered torsos into the woods before burning the victims’ clothes and belongings.

    Three days later, Mitchell and two other men robbed the Red Rock Trading Post at gunpoint, driving off in Slim’s truck, which they later burned.

    Mitchell was eventually convicted on 11 counts, including two counts of first-degree murder, carjacking resulting in death and robbery, among others. He could not be executed for the murders under federal and Navajo law – but because carjacking falls under another section of federal law, he could face the death penalty for that.

    The Navajo Nation opposed a death sentence as did the victims’ families, swaying the U.S. Attorney for Arizona at the time to decide against a capital case. But Reinhardt said that decision was overruled by then-Attorney General John Ashcroft and the death penalty was sought.

    Defense experts determined that Mitchell had mental and emotional problems and a distant mother, that he had substance-abuse issues and was likely abused as a child.

    But the experts also described him as a borderline sociopath who denied he was intoxicated at the time of the killing, who talked calmly about killing the girl and who had a history of “swinging dogs and cats by their tails and then throwing them off bridges just for fun.”

    The appeals court said Mitchell’s attorneys “had to walk a very careful line to avoid opening the door to the highly damaging” experts’ reports.

    Rather than risk that, by introducing evidence of his upbringing that could explain his behavior, they built a defense on three themes: That Mitchell’s life had value and was worth saving, that Orsinger was the mastermind but had not been sentenced to death, and that the Navajo Nation did not want Mitchell executed.

    “Considering the unusual brutality of these crimes … it is a remarkable tribute to Mitchell’s lawyers that they were able to get the jury to find several mitigating factors,” the appeals court said. “There is no showing that Mitchell’s lawyers’ strategy was unreasonable.”

    But where the majority saw “effective assistance,” Reinhardt saw only a “worthless and implausible ‘good guy’ defense” that ignored all the elements that could have swayed a juror to vote against the death penalty.

    Reinhardt said that federal executions are rare and reserved for crimes that have national significance, like the Boston Marathon or Oklahoma City bombers. He said Mitchell – who was 20 at the time of the killings and did not have a criminal record – “committed a horrible crime (but) it was hardly one of national import or of particular federal interest other than the fact that it involved the Navajo Nation.”

    http://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2015/0...double-murder/

  10. #10
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13,014
    On October 26, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit DENIED Mitchell's petition for en banc rehearing.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.a...es/15-8725.htm

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •