Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: California Capital Punishment History

  1. #1
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217

    California Capital Punishment History

    Legal executions in California were authorized under the Criminal Practices Act of 1851. On February 14, 1872, capital punishment was incorporated into the Penal Code, stating:

    A judgment of death must be executed within the walls or yard of a jail, or some convenient private place in the county. The Sheriff of the county must be present at the execution, and must invite the presence of a physician, the District Attorney of the county, and at least twelve reputable citizens, to be selected by him; and he shall at the request of the defendant, permit such ministers of the gospel, not exceeding two, as the defendant may name, and any persons, relatives or friends, not to exceed five, to be present at the execution, together with such peace officers as he may think expedient, to witness the execution. But no other persons than those mentioned in this section can be present at the execution, nor can any person under age be allowed to witness the same.

    The various counties may have some records of the executions conducted under the jurisdiction of the counties, but the department knows of no compilation of these.

    State Executions

    Capital punishment on a county level continued until an amendment by the Legislature in 1891 provided:

    *

    A judgment of death must be executed within the walls of one of the State Prisons designated by the Court by which judgment is rendered.
    *

    In this statute, the warden replaced the sheriff as the person who must be present at the execution and invitation to the attorney general, rather than to the district attorney, was required.
    *

    Executions were conducted at both of the California state prisons then existing – San Quentin and Folsom. There apparently was no official rule by which judges ordered men hanged at Folsom rather than San Quentin or vice versa. However, it was customary to send recidivists to Folsom.
    *

    The first state-conducted execution was held March 3, 1893 at San Quentin. The first execution at Folsom was December 13, 1895.

    Lethal Gas

    In 1937, the Legislature provided that lethal gas replace hanging, with August 27, 1937 as the effective date. The law did not affect the execution method for those already sentenced. As a result, the last execution by hanging at Folsom was conducted December 3, 1937. The last execution by hanging at San Quentin was held May 1, 1942; the defendant had been convicted of murder in 1936.

    A total of 215 inmates were hanged at San Quentin and a total of 92 were hanged at Folsom.

    The only lethal gas chamber in the state was constructed at San Quentin. The first execution by lethal gas was conducted December 2, 1938. From that date through 1967 a total of 194 persons were executed by gas, all at San Quentin. This total includes four (4) women.

    Legal Challenges and Changes

    For 25 years after 1967, there were no executions in California due to various State and United States Supreme Court decisions.

    In 1972, the California Supreme Court found that the death penalty constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the state constitution. As a result, 107 individuals had their sentences changed to other than death. In November 1972, nine months after the decision, the California electorate amended the state constitution and overruled the State Supreme Court.

    In 1973, the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty was unconstitutional as it was being administered at that time in a number of states.

    California legislation was passed in 1973 which made the death penalty mandatory in certain cases under certain conditions. Among these were kidnapping if the victim dies, train wrecking if any person dies, assault by a life prisoner if the victim dies within a year, treason against the state, and first-degree murder under specific conditions (for hire, of a peace officer, of a witness to prevent testimony, if committed during a robbery or burglary, if committed during the course of a rape by force, if committed during performance of lewd and lascivious acts upon children, by persons previously convicted of murder).

    In late 1976, the California Supreme Court, basing its decision on a United States Supreme Court ruling earlier that year, held that the California death penalty statute was unconstitutional under the Federal Constitution because it did not allow the defendant to present any evidence in mitigation. Following this ruling, 70 inmates had their sentences changed to other than death.

    Capital Punishment Reinstated

    The California State Legislature re-enacted the death penalty statute in 1977. Under the new statute, evidence in mitigation was permitted.
    The death penalty was reinstated as a possible punishment for first-degree murder under certain conditions. These "special circumstances" include: murder for financial gain, murder by a person previously convicted of murder, murder of multiple victims, murder with torture, murder of a peace officer, murder of a witness to prevent testimony and several other murders under particular circumstances.

    In 1977, the Penal Code also was revised to include the sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. At that time, the punishment for kidnapping for ransom, extortion, or robbery was changed from death to life without parole. Treason, train derailing or wrecking, and securing the death of an innocent person through perjury became punishable by death or life imprisonment without parole.

    Proposition 7, on the California ballot in November 1978, superseded the 1977 statutes and is the death penalty statute under which California currently operates.

    Under state law, cases in which the death penalty has been decreed are automatically reviewed by the State Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may:

    *

    Affirm the conviction and the death sentence;
    *

    Affirm the conviction but reverse the death sentence (which results in a retrial of the penalty phase only); or
    *

    Reverse the conviction (which results in a complete new trial).

    Even if the California Supreme Court affirms the death sentence, the inmate can initiate appeals on separate constitutional issues. Called "writs of habeas corpus," these appeals may be heard in both state and federal courts.

    Although the death penalty was reinstated in 1978, no executions were carried out in California until April 1992 when Robert Alton Harris was put to death in the San Quentin gas chamber. This was the first execution in more than 25 years.

    Lethal Injection

    In January 1993, a new law went into effect allowing inmates to choose lethal injection or lethal gas as the method of execution. In August 1993, condemned inmate David Mason was executed after voluntarily waiving his federal appeals. Because Mason did not choose a method of execution, he was put to death by lethal gas, as the law then stipulated.

    In October 1994, a U.S. District Judge, Northern District (San Francisco) ruled that the gas chamber was cruel and unusual punishment, barring the state from using that method of execution. That ruling was upheld by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in February, 1996.

    That same year, the Penal Code was modified to state that if either manner of execution is held invalid, the punishment of death shall be imposed by the alternative means. The law further stipulated that lethal injection become the "default" method of execution should an inmate fail to choose. Serial killer William Bonin was executed on February 23, 1996 by lethal injection, the first California execution using that method.

    In February 2006, condemned inmate Michael Angelo Morales’ execution was stayed because of his claim that California’s administration of its lethal injection protocol violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. On December 15 of that year, the U.S. District Court held that “California’s lethal-injection protocol – as actually administered in practice – create[d] an undue and unnecessary risk that an inmate will suffer pain so extreme that it offends the Eight Amendment.” The Court also stated that “Defendants’ implementation of lethal injection is broken, but it can be fixed.”

    In January 2007, the Governor’s Office submitted a response to the Court’s December 15, 2006 Memorandum of Intended Decision. The Court had identified five specific deficiencies in California’s lethal injection protocol arising from the case of Morales v. Tilton. The specific deficiencies identified were:

    *

    Inconsistent and unreliable screening of execution team members;
    *

    A lack of meaningful training, supervision, and oversight of the execution team;
    *

    Inconsistent and unreliable record keeping;
    *

    Improper mixing, preparation, and administration of sodium thiopental by the execution team; and
    *

    Inadequate lighting, overcrowded conditions, and poorly designed facilities in which the execution team must work.

    The Governor immediately directed CDCR to undertake a thorough review of all aspects of its lethal injection protocols. CDCR informed the court it would undertake a thorough review and submit to the Court by May 15, 2007 a revised process.

    On May 15, 2007 CDCR released a report to the Court proposing revisions to the lethal injection protocol. In order to address the Court’s concerns and improve the lethal injection protocol, the State:

    *

    Established a screening process for selection of execution team members and a periodic review process for team members.
    *

    Established a comprehensive training program for all execution team members. The training regimen focused on custody and care of the condemned inmate, the infusion process, intravenous application and vein access, characteristics and effects of each chemical used in the process, proper preparation and mixing of chemicals, the security of the lethal injection facility, proper record keeping and other areas.
    *

    Developed standardized record keeping to ensure there are complete and reliable records of each execution. The State developed specific forms, processes and formats to ensure completeness, accuracy and consistency and provided specialized training.
    *

    Developed training processes for the proper use of sodium thiopental. Training processes were developed for proper mixing, preparation and administration of sodium thiopental.
    *

    Recommended improvements to the lethal injection facility at San Quentin State Prison, including steps to ensure adequate equipment, lighting and space. Current law requires that all executions be conducted within the walls of San Quentin State Prison. In 2007, a lethal injection facility was constructed to address the U.S. District Court’s concerns.
    *

    Proposed revisions to the lethal injection protocol, including modifying the procedures used to administer the lethal injection. The State consulted with experts and visited other jurisdictions. The revised protocol will ensure the procedure does not create an undue and unnecessary risk that an inmate will suffer pain so extreme that it offends the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

    In November 2007, the Marin County Superior Court held that the Administrative Procedure Act required CDCR to promulgate the protocol as a regulation. A lethal injection protocol had been in effect since 1993. No court had required it to be promulgated as a regulation.

    In April 2009, CDCR submitted draft lethal injection regulations to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). On May 1, 2009, CDCR posted the notice of proposed regulations in the OAL Register and provided public notice on its Internet website. The public comment period began on May 1, 2009. On June 30, 2009 CDCR held a public hearing regarding the proposed regulations. In January 2010 CDCR issued a notice of modification to the text of the proposed lethal injection regulations. The changes in the re-notice were in response to comments received regarding the originally proposed regulation text.

    On April 29, 2010 CDCR submitted its final rulemaking package for the lethal injection regulations to the OAL. On June 8, the OAL notified CDCR that it was disapproving the regulations submitted on April 29. On June 11, CDCR published a second re-notice to the public addressing the issues raised by the OAL, and after accepting and responding to public comments, re-submitted its regulations on July 6, 2010.

    On July 30, 2010, the OAL notified CDCR that it had approved and certified for adoption the regulations for lethal injection. The rulemaking record was filed with the Secretary of State the same day. August 29, 2010 is the permanent effective date of the regulations.
    Inmates on Condemned Status

    All male prisoners on condemned status are housed at a maximum-security custody level in three units at San Quentin State Prison. Females are housed in a maximum-security unit at Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla. The number of condemned inmates has increased steadily since 1978. A current statistical summary of all condemned inmates currently under supervision and related material about capital punishment is available on this website.

    Capital Punishment – Key Events

    1851 — Legal executions authorized under the Criminal Practices Act of 1851.

    1872 — February 14—Capital punishment authorized in Penal Code.

    1891 — Amendments provided for capital punishment to occur inside state prisons. Until 1891, executions were conducted by county sheriffs. No compilation of California executions before 1891 is known to exist.

    1893 — March 3—First state-conducted execution. Jose GABRIEL, convicted of murdering an aged farm couple, was hanged at San Quentin. Executions (by hanging) were conducted at both existing state prisons - San Quentin and Folsom.

    1937 — Legislature replaces hanging with lethal gas as execution method, effective August 27, 1937.

    1937 — December 3—Final execution by hanging at Folsom State Prison. A total of 92 inmates were executed by hanging at Folsom.

    1938 — Gas chamber installed at San Quentin.

    1938 — December 2—First executions by lethal gas at San Quentin. Robert Lee CANNON and Albert KESSEL were convicted of the murder of Warden Clarence Larkin. Four other inmates were also executed in connection with this murder, three within two weeks.

    1941 — November 21—First woman, Eithel Leta Juanita SPINELLI, executed by lethal gas in California.

    1942 — May 1—Final execution by hanging at San Quentin. A total of 215 inmates were executed by hanging at San Quentin.

    1962 — August 8—Elizabeth Ann DUNCAN, the last woman to date to be executed by lethal gas.

    1967 — April 12—Aaron MITCHELL, convicted of killing a peace officer during robbery, executed by lethal gas. A total of 194 had been executed by lethal gas, 190 men and 4 women.

    1972 — Death sentence declared unconstitutional. 107 taken off condemned status.

    1976 — Death sentence declared unconstitutional. 68 taken off condemned status.

    1977 — California State Legislature reenacted the death penalty statute.

    1978 — November—California voters approve Proposition 7 reaffirming the death penalty.

    1992 — April 21—Robert Alton HARRIS, convicted of killing two teenagers in San Diego, executed by lethal gas—the first California execution in 25 years.

    1993 — January 1—California law changed to allow condemned inmates to choose lethal injection or lethal gas as method of execution.

    1995 — October 4. U.S. District Judge, Northern District, ruled the gas chamber was cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling was upheld by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals February 21, 1996.

    1996 — February 23—Serial killer William George BONIN, convicted of sexually assaulting and killing 14 boys in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, was the first California inmate executed by lethal injection.

    2006 – February 21 – Condemned inmate Michael Angelo Morales’ execution is stayed because of his claim that California’s administration of its lethal injection protocol violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

    2006 – December 15 – The U.S. District Court held that California’s lethal-injection protocol as administered created a risk that an inmate will suffer pain and so violated the Eighth Amendment.

    2007 – January 16 – The Governor directed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to undertake a thorough review of all aspects of its lethal injection protocols. CDCR informed the Court it would undertake a review and on May 15, 2007, filed a revised protocol with the Court.

    2007 – November 29 – The Marin County Superior Court held that the Administrative Procedure Act required CDCR to promulgate the protocol as a regulation.

    2009 – May 1 – CDCR posted the notice of the proposed lethal injection regulations in the Office of Administrative Law Register, thus beginning the public comment period.

    2010 – July 30 – The Office of Administrative Law approved and certified for adoption the regulations for lethal injection.

    2010 – August 29 – The permanent effective date of the regulations.

    http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Capital_Punis...unishment.html

  2. #2
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    A Timeline of the Death Penalty in California

    April 11, 1878: The first recorded execution in what is now California occurs when four Native Americans are shot in San Diego County for conspiracy to commit murder.

    February 17, 1972: The CA Supreme Court rules in California v. Anderson that capital punishment is impermissible cruel and unusual punishment as it degraded and dehumanized the parties involved. It held that the penalty is “unnecessary to any legitimate goal of the state and [is] incompatible with the dignity of man and the judicial process”. This leads to 107 sentences being commuted to life without parole, including Charles Manson and Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy’s assassin.

    June 29, 1972: The US Supreme Court rules 5-4 in Georgia v. Furman that the arbitrary and inconsistent manner in which the death penalty was applied (citing, in particular, racial and geographic disparities) violated the 8th and 14th Amendments and constituted cruel and unusual punishment. This causes a de facto moratorium on capital punishment. throughout the United States

    November 7, 1972: Proposition 17 passes, beginning the process of superseding the Anderson ruling by amending the state constitution to reinstate the death penalty. Rather than switch to the federal “cruel and unusual” standard, the amendment keeps California’s “cruel or unusual” standard, but includes a clause expressly declaring the death penalty to be neither.

    1976: The US Supreme court affirms the constitutionality of the death penalty so long as the sentencing scheme provide objective criteria to direct and limit sentencing discretion, appellate review of all death sentences. It must also allow the sentencing judge or jury to take into account the character and record of an individual defendant. The next year, the death penalty is reinstated in California.

    1978 - Proposition 7 passes, which calls for automatic appeals to the California Supreme Court in cases involving the death penalty. The Court would then directly affirm or reverse the sentence and conviction without an intermediate appeal to the Courts of Appeal.

    1992 - Robert Harris is the first individual executed in the state in two decades

    1994 – Following a US District court ruling that the gas chamber is cruel and unusual punishment, lethal injection is made California’s default mode of execution.

    2006 - US District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel blocks the execution of Michael Morales because of concerns that lethal injection, if administered incorrectly, may result in intense pain that would constitute cruel and unusual punishment This causes a de facto moratorium on the death penalty in California, as no licensed medical professional will perform the procedure.

    2010 – A California judge lifts the injunction against lethal injection by certifying new procedures that are meant to ensure that executions are conducted as painlessly as possible. So far, no executions have taken place since.

    http://www.stanford.edu/group/progre...gi-bin/?p=1773

  3. #3
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    1962

    Nov. 24: San Quentin's 31 Death Row residents staged what prison officials called "a small insurrection" yesterday over their film fare. They banged on walls, tables and bars, shouted and generally raised a ruckus, said acting warden Louis Nelson. The incident began on Nov. 15, when the men were scheduled to be shown "Tight Little Island" as their weekly movie. The prisoners protested they had heard about this British-made film and that the Scotch dialect of the players was hard to understand and they did not want it. In the place of this comedy, which is about a ship carrying a cargo of Scotch whiskey running aground on a small island, the men were shown "Cry of the City." "Cry of the City," with Shelley Winters and Victor Mature, has a bit about an ex-convict pushing an old woman down a flight of stairs and killing her. The prisoners acclaimed it. But when they were shown the film, they were told they would have only one picture on Thanksgiving. Ordinarily they get two - one as their regular weekly Thursday movie and the other as a Thanksgiving treat. On Thanksgiving they were shown another British picture, "Kind Hearts and Coronets." This film has eight murders in it and met with high approval. Yesterday the condemned men during the exercise period decided they were entitled to another film to take the place of "Cry of the City" when the film was shown in place of "Tight Little Island." The guard on duty ordered the men back to their cells when the ruckus began. Carl Bates, 41, who threw a Molotov cocktail into a Los Angeles bar and burned six persons to death, was spokesman for the movie lovers.

    "I told Bates I wouldn't talk to any inmate who was in a state of insurrection," said Nelson. "They knew that if they didn't go back in we'd put them back in, so they went back."

    Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/...#ixzz2CKPAQbF5
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  4. #4
    Admiral CnCP Legend JT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1976
    Location
    In ma hoose
    Posts
    1,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Heidi View Post
    The prisoners protested they had heard about this British-made film and that the Scotch dialect of the players was hard to understand and they did not want it.
    That's understandable. I still have difficulty understanding some Scottish accents even after several years of living there!

  5. #5
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33,217
    After killing her husband, campaign helped save abused woman from San Quentin gallows

    Nellie May Madison came within a few weeks of being the only woman executed by hanging in California.

    She dodged the gallows but the legal battles after her 1934 murder trial continued for years before Madison was released to spend the remainder of her life in the Inland Empire.

    Her trial and its aftermath helped change the way battered women would later be able to use their abusive relationships as justification in California criminal trials. This was accomplished by bringing into the open the abuse she endured before she killed her partner Eric Madison. (She had taken his name but she later found that they were never legally married).

    In the years that followed “attorneys no longer proved reluctant to cite the abuse as a strategy of getting clients exonerated,” wrote Kathleen A. Cairns in “The Enigma Woman,” her 2007 book about Nellie Madison.

    “By the late 1980s, spousal abuse had become an acceptable defense in criminal trials, and by the early 1990s state laws mandated that judges accept the courtroom testimony of experts in the field,” Cairns wrote.

    But when Nellie went to trial in 1934 for the shooting of her partner, such a defense was rare. In fact, her attorney made no mention of it in her trial, a decision that almost sent her to the gallows.

    Nellie Madison, who had been married three previous times, met Eric Madison while they worked at the Village Inn Hotel in Palm Springs. Nellie was a manager there and at a sister resort in Lake Arrowhead. Eric was reportedly a former San Bernardino cafeteria manager, said the San Bernardino Sun.

    Eric, as was often the case, was fired from the Village Inn for his abusive behavior and rudeness. But he managed to convince Nellie to move with him to Riverside.

    Later they went to Utah and got married, or at least so thought Nellie.

    The “license” she signed turned out to be phony and apparently so was the minister, according to Cairns’ book. It appeared the bogus ceremony was set up to enable Eric to get his hands on an inheritance Nellie had received.

    Eventually, they moved to Burbank. They lived in an apartment next to Warner Brothers’ studio where Eric was hired as a cashier, though within a few weeks, he lost that job. The couple began arguing frequently, focusing on Eric spending time with other women and his abuse of Nellie.

    On the evening of March 24, 1934, Nellie claimed Eric threw several knives at her during an argument and then went to bed. At that point, Nellie fired five bullets into his back (neighbors thought the sound was from filming next door at Warner Brothers) and then left the apartment. A day later she was arrested by Burbank police hiding in a cabin 80 miles north of Los Angeles along the Ridge Route, today’s 5 Freeway.

    When her trial began in Los Angeles on June 6, the District Attorney’s Office announced it would seek the death penalty — at that time no woman had ever been executed in California, which then was still done by hanging.

    “Mrs. Madison shot her husband in the back,” prosecuting attorney George Stahlman told the Los Angeles Evening Express. “The motive for the murder is of no concern to the prosecution.”

    Throughout her trial, Nellie sat quietly showing little or no emotion.

    The Los Angeles Examiner of March 27 said she exhibited “an inscrutable demeanor” and in headlines called her “Sphinx Woman.” The Los Angeles Herald that same day called her the “Enigma Woman.”

    Her attorney, Joseph Ryan, ignored or didn’t know of Eric’s abusive behavior and infidelity. Instead he presented a curious defense claiming the body found in the apartment was not that of Eric Madison. Some witnesses even testified they thought the victim was some other unknown person.

    The jury was unconvinced and came back June 22 with a verdict of guilty. The jury was given the option to request mercy in her sentencing, but did not, ensuring she would receive the death penalty.

    “They are not going to hang me,” she told reporters while being led out of the courtroom. Four days later, Judge Charles Fricke ordered her sent to the gallows at San Quentin in October.

    What followed was almost a long campaign of legal work, first to keep Nellie from being executed, and later having her sentence reduced to make her eligible for parole. Women’s groups and many men in the state reacted to her sentencing by opposing the hanging of a woman no matter how serious the crime. They urged her sentence be reduced to life imprisonment.

    Her new attorney Lloyd Nix — hired by her third ex-husband, also an attorney — undertook eight years of work, delivering to the governor’s office hundreds of pages of testimony from dozens of people who described Eric’s abusive and unfaithful behavior to Nellie and other women.

    Even the members of her jury later petitioned Gov. Frank Merriam to commute the sentence after learning of the abuse. One friend commented that when he heard that Eric had been shot, he figured it was done by his previous wife, who had had an equally abusive relationship with him.

    Nellie’s case was also assisted by some sympathetic reporting by legendary Los Angeles newspaperwoman Aggie Underwood, who interviewed her several times at the Tehachapi State Prison for Women in Kern County.

    A headline in the Sun on Sept. 17, 1935, announced “Mrs. Madison Saved From Gallows, Will Spend Life in Cell.” It said Merriam reduced the sentence to life imprisonment.

    But for Nellie and Nix, the impassioned campaign to further reduce her sentence continued.

    Appeals to the governor came from a variety of prominent people, including a family friend, Charles Cooper, a former Montana judge and father of actor Gary Cooper. The public pressure went on for years until a new governor, Culbert Olson, approved her parole on March 27, 1943.

    Nellie, now 48, eventually moved to San Bernardino and took a few odd jobs. In October 1944, she married house painter John Wagner and stayed out of the headlines for the rest of her life.

    Cairns in her book said the ordeals of her life, before, during and after her trial took a toll on her, leaving Nellie with high blood pressure. In 1951, she suffered a stroke that left her partially paralyzed, and two years later she had a more serious stroke. She died in San Bernardino County Hospital on July 8, 1953, and is buried at Mountain View Cemetery in San Bernardino.

    Her obituary in the Sun two days later, gave no hint of her past, just that she was merely “a resident of San Bernardino 10 years and of California 30 years.”

    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/20/after-...entin-gallows/
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  6. #6
    Member Member SoonerSaint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    70
    This is from 1959. Commentary on the gas chamber, and I love that it is punctuated with a George Bernard Shaw quote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF1v4oquS2s
    Last edited by SoonerSaint; 11-16-2022 at 12:40 AM.
    "It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them".--Alfred Adler

  7. #7
    Moderator Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,316


    California Women’s death row, located behind and inside a fenced in cage in the Central California Women’s Facility’s AdSeg Unit
    Thank you for the adventure - Axol

    Tried so hard and got so far, but in the end it doesn’t even matter - Linkin Park

    Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired. My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever. - Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt

    I’m going to the ghost McDonalds - Garcello

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •