izmir escort izmir escort antalya escort porno jigolo izmir escort bursa escort porno izle türk porno havalandırma sistemleri porno izle saha betonu takipçi satın al youtube haberleri alsancak escort bursa escort bursa escort gaziantep escort denizli escort izmir escort istanbul escort istanbul escort istanbul escort izmir escort
Johnny Avila, Jr. - California
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Johnny Avila, Jr. - California

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5,533

    Johnny Avila, Jr. - California




    Facts of the Crime:

    Sentenced on March 21, 1995 for the murders of Dorothy Medina and Arlene Sanchez. On the night of August 1, 1991, testimony showed, Medina and Sanchez joined about 30 people who had gathered at Richard Avila's residence in the expectation of a drive by shooting. Witnesses said people were drinking beer and smoking marijuana and PCP. Prosecutors said that during the course of the night Medina was brutally gang-raped, then taken with Sanchez to a canal where they were both shot twice in the head, killing them.

  2. #2
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    12,379
    May 16, 2006

    S.C. Upholds Death Sentence in Killing of Fresno Women

    Potential Jurors May be Excused Based Upon Written Questionnaire, Justices Rule

    Prospective jurors in a capital case may be discharged for cause based solely on their answers to a written questionnaire, if it is clear from their answers that they are unwilling to temporarily set aside their own beliefs and follow the law, the California Supreme Court held yesterday.

    The court upheld the 1994 first degree murder conviction and 1995 death sentence of Johnny Avila Jr. for the 1991 murders of Dorothy Medina and Arlene Sanchez. Also convicted for the murders were Avila’s cousin, Richard Avila, and Jeffrey Spradlin, who was also convicted of rape while acting in concert

    Fresno Superior Court Judge Stephen J. Kane imposed the sentences, after a joint trial on guilt followed by separate penalty phases. Kane is currently awaiting a confirmation hearing, having been nominated by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to the Fifth District Court of Appeal.

    On the night of August 1, 1991, testimony showed, Medina and Sanchez joined about 30 people who had gathered at Richard Avila’s residence in the expectation of a drive by shooting. Witnesses said people were drinking beer and smoking marijuana and PCP.

    Prosecutors said that during the course of the night Medina was brutally gang-raped, then taken with Sanchez to a canal where they were both shot twice in the head, killing them.

    With help from counsel, the trial court prepared a jury questionnaire consisting of 108 questions, several pages of which dealt with the potential jurors’ views on the death penalty. Based solely on the questionnaires, Kane proposed to excuse for cause 14 of the first 75 prospective jurors because their responses indicated that they would either always impose the death penalty, or would never impose it, or that they had read or heard information about the case that created a strong belief in the defendant’s guilt

    The defendant unsuccessfully objected to the excusal of four of the 14, arguing that subsequent questioning might have revealed that they were qualified to sit on the jury.

    Justice Marvin R. Baxter, writing for the Supreme Court, said the trial judge acted within his discretion:

    “The questionnaire at issue here . . . asked whether a prospective juror held such conscientious objections to the death penalty that, regardless of the evidence or the strength of proof, he or she ‘automatically’ would refuse to return a first degree murder verdict, find a special circumstance, or impose the death penalty. Any juror who ‘automatically’ would vote in way that precluded the death penalty would clearly be disqualified.”

    Baxter wrote that the questionnaire did not contain the same defects the court found in questionnaires in earlier cases:

    “Thus, this questionnaire format . . . included more expansive and detailed questions on capital punishment and gave jurors the clear opportunity to disclose views against it so strong as to disqualify them for duty on a death penalty case.”

    The court also held that when a trial court determines that a defendant has made a prima facie showing that a particular prospective juror has been challenged by the prosecution because of bias, the court need not ask the prosecutor to justify challenges to other prospective jurors of the same group for which the court had already denied Batson /Wheeler motions.

    The court disapproved People v. McGee (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 559, to the extent that it is inconsistent.

    Baxter noted:

    “In McGee, the Court of Appeal characterized Wheeler motions as challenging “the selection of a jury, not the rejection of an individual juror the issue is whether a pattern of systematic exclusion exists.” Accordingly, it held that once the trial court has found a prima facie case of group bias in the excusal of one prospective juror, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to provide race-neutral explanations for all challenges to prospective jurors who are members of the same group.”

    Baxter wrote that the McGee analysis was flawed:

    “The premise of the Court of Appeal’s analysis in McGee, however, is incorrect. When a party makes a Wheeler motion, the issue is not whether there is a pattern of systematic exclusion rather, the issue is whether a particular prospective juror has been challenged because of group bias.”

    The court also held that the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to eliminate four jurors who did not wholeheartedly support the death penalty did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights to due process, a fundamentally fair trial by an impartial jury, or a reliable judgment.

    The case is People v. Avila, 06 S.O.S. 2295.

    http://www.metnews.com/articles/2006/avil051606.htm

    On March 26, 2007, the United States Supreme Court denied Avila's certiorari petition.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.a...es/06-8513.htm

  3. #3
    Administrator Moh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    12,379
    On July 19, 2011, Avila filed a habeas petition in Federal District Court.

    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cal...t00434/226305/

  4. #4
    Senior Member CnCP Legend JLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,446
    Avila filed another habeas petition before the California Supreme Court on June 14, 2012 and it has been fully briefed since March 4, 2014.

    https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca....JRMCAgCg%3D%3D

  5. #5
    Senior Member CnCP Addict Bobsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    617
    Fresno County Death Row Inmate Dies, Officials Believe Coronavirus To Blame

    FRESNO COUNTY, Calif. (FOX26 NEWS) — A Fresno County sentenced to California's death row has died from complications of coronavirus, according to prison officials.

    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has announced that condemned inmate Johnny Avila Jr., 62, was pronounced dead Sunday morning,
    Officials say Avila died at an outside hospital from what appears to be complications related to COVID-19.

    An exact cause of death will be determined by the coroner.


    Avila was sentenced to death in Fresno County on March 21, 1996, for two counts of first-degree murder.


    He had been on death row since March 31, 1995.


    There are currently 716 people on California’s death row.


    https://kmph.com/news/local/fresno-c...-officials-say
    Last edited by Helen; 07-26-2020 at 09:48 PM. Reason: spacing
    I believe in the death penalty

    ~James Dobson

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •