izmir escort izmir escort antalya escort porno jigolo izmir escort bursa escort alsancak escort bursa escort bursa escort gaziantep escort denizli escort izmir escort istanbul escort istanbul escort istanbul escort izmir escort 404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /panelr00t/dosyalar/linkler/cncpunishment.com.php1 was not found on this server.

Jimmy Carter calls for fresh moratorium on death penalty
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Jimmy Carter calls for fresh moratorium on death penalty

  1. #1
    Administrator Heidi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010

    Jimmy Carter calls for fresh moratorium on death penalty

    Carter says it amounts to cruel and unusual punishment and justices should reintroduce ban that stood from 1972 to 1976

    Former US president Jimmy Carter has called for a new nationwide moratorium on the death penalty, arguing that it is applied so unfairly across the 32 states that still have the death sentence that it amounts to a form of cruel and unusual punishment prohibited under the US constitution.

    In an interview with the Guardian, Carter calls on the US supreme court to reintroduce the ban on capital punishment that it imposed between 1972 and 1976. The death penalty today, he said, was every bit as arbitrary as it was when the 9 justices suspended it on grounds of inconsistency in the case of Furman v Georgia 41 years ago.

    "It's time for the supreme court to look at the totality of the death penalty once again," Carter said. "My preference would be for the court to rule that it is cruel and unusual punishment, which would make it prohibitive under the US constitution.

    Carter's appeal for a new moratorium falls at a time of mounting unease about the huge disparities in the use of capital punishment in America. Recent research has shown that most of the 1,352 executions that have taken place since the supreme court allowed them to recommence in 1976 have emanated from just 2% of the counties in the nation.

    Amid a critical shortage of medical drugs used in lethal injections caused by a European boycott of US corrections departments, death penalty states are also adopting increasingly desperate execution methods. The new techniques range from deploying previously untested sedatives in lethal injections, to concocting improvised batches of the chemicals through compounding pharmacies.

    Carter's main concern is what he sees as the injustice in the kinds of individuals who are most likely to be sentenced to death and executed. He will be raising his concerns at a national symposium on the death penalty held by the American Bar Association and hosted by his Carter Center in Atlanta, Georgia on Tuesday.

    "The only consistency today is that the people who are executed are almost always poor, from a racial minority or mentally deficient," he told the Guardian. "In America today, if you have a good attorney you can avoid the death penalty; if you are white you can avoid it; if your victim was a racial minority you can avoid it. But if you are very poor or mentally deficient, or the victim is white, that's the way you get sentenced to death."

    He added: "It's almost inconceivable in these modern days to imagine that a rich white man would be executed if he murdered a black person."

    Carter's call for a renewed moratorium is particularly significant given his role, paradoxically, in helping to restore the death penalty in the 1970s. In 1973, as governor of Georgia, he signed into law a new set of guidelines that were designed to meet the objections of the supreme court over the inconsistencies in the death penalty set out in the Furman case.

    Those new guidelines were reviewed by the supreme court, and on the back of that case - Gregg v Georgia - the 9 justices removed their previous injunction and allowed the death penalty to resume. Carter now looks back on the part he played with frank regret.

    "If I had to do that over again I would certainly be much more forceful in taking actions what would have prohibited the death penalty," he said, referring to his signing of the 1973 guidelines. "In complete honesty, when I was governor [of Georgia] I was not nearly as concerned about the unfairness of the application of the death penalty as I am now. I know much more now. I was looking at it from a much more parochial point of view - I didn't see the injustice of it as I do now."

    In recent years Carter has striven to make up for what he sees as his past weakness on the issue in his home state, which has carried out some of the most controversial judicial killings in modern times. He campaigned vociferously against the execution of Troy Davis in September 2011 amid serious doubts about the prisoner's guilt .

    He continues to campaign in the case of Warren Hill, a Georgia death row inmate who has been declared intellectually disabled (or "mentally retarded" in US jurisprudence) by all the psychiatrists who have examined him, yet still faces execution despite a US supreme court ban on executing intellectually disabled people. "I would hope Georgia would commute Warren Hill's sentence completely," Carter said.

    At Tuesday's symposium, the ABA will present the findings of its 8-year examination of the fairness and accuracy of several of the leading death penalty jurisdictions in the US. It has carried out a series of assessments of the way capital punishment is applied in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, and Texas - states that represent 65% of all executions that have taken place since 1976.

    The ABA has identified 12 areas in which the practice of capital punishment in the US continues to experience serious problems. They include the use of ill-equipped, poorly trained and under-paid lawyers to defend people facing capital prosecutions; racial disparities in the pursuit of cases ' in Georgia, those suspected of killing whites are almost 5 times more likely to be sentenced to death than those suspected of killing blacks; huge variations in the rules relating to DNA testing; widespread confusion among jurors sitting at death penalty trials; and the fact that all the assessed states continue to allow people with severe mental illness to be sentenced to death and executed.

    (source: Ed Pilkington will be acting as a moderator at the American Bar Association symposium at the Carter Center on Tuesday--The Guardian)
    An uninformed opponent is a dangerous opponent.

    "Y'all be makin shit up" ~ Markeith Loyd

  2. #2
    Moderator Dave from Florida's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Carter is full of peanuts. He purposely appointed Stephen Reinhardt, Harry Pregerson, Gilbert Merritt, Boyce Martin and Frank Johnson among others to interfere with the death penalty in circuits with a large number of inmates.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Frequent Poster elsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    North Carolina
    I say he is full of something else.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Member AdamSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Santa Cruz Calif USA
    I don't consider Jimmy Carter much of a genius. And especially not as a criminal justice expert.

    Mostly just an average smart athlete who got into the Naval Academy and served in the submarine forces.

    Peanut farmer on a family farm, local politician, state senator and governor, and then the DNC put him up against Ford, who was weak due to his association with Nixon. The entire GOP was weak in that election and they lost the US House, the US Senate, and the White House all at once as a result of Watergate.

    One term as US President. Nothing about his life except his charitable home building strikes me. He and his wife lived in public housing for awhile, so he has always been sincere about helping the poor.

    If he had been FBI director then I would care about his opinion of the death penalty. He was not. Ergo I do not care what he thinks.

    He is not a well informed authority on crime and punishment.

    We definitely do not need a fresh moratorium on executions.

    We actually need to speed them up instead. 10 years of reviews and appeals should be the maximum delay. 5 years would be even better.
    Last edited by AdamSmith; 11-11-2013 at 09:41 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts