Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 419

Thread: Alcasser teenage girls case, Spain

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418

    The Alcàsser teenage girls case, Spain

    Please, share with everyone!


    I want to tell you this creepy story which shocked and shamed Spain in November 1992. It's a long story with so many angles and the crime has never been solved properly, but it's definitely a worthwhile read:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alcasser_Girls



    Some people in Spain have always thought that this crime points to a cover-up in an attempt to cover the identity of whoever killed them. When the corpses were found in the site of murders in La Romana hills, the Civil Guard police found a bit of medical paper nearby the ditch with the name of Enrique Anglés in it. Then, they went to Anglés' home in Catarroja (five kilometres northeast from Alcàsser) to arrest him, but at this time Antonio Anglés (brother of Enrique) managed to flee by jumping through a window even when the building was surrounded by police officers.
    Few minutes later, Miguel Ricart entered Anglés' home whilst carrying a bag with some oranges (because he lived there with his friend Antonio Anglés), and finally the police officers arrested him without any real suspicion against him.
    Such fact is odd because the murderers apparently buried the three teenage girls in mid-November 1992, and they were suddenly found in late January 1993 by two beekeepers, being such a bit of paper remaining stuck there as long as 75 consecutive days without being blow away by wind gusts. It is weird, isn't it?

    Some blokes from a Spanish website put a piece of paper right in the same place and wait just for two weeks, then they came back to check it and the paper had completely disappear due to the wind gusts. They tried it a few times, and they only found the paper two times which was like 40 metres away.
    One theory is that someone put that paper the earlier day there to incriminate both Miguel Ricart and Antonio Angles. It's also strange that they both were minor criminals more focused on drug and robbery stuff, and then suddenly became the sadistic murders ever as the court stated they made this awful triple crime only by themselves. Other theories even suggested that the purpose was to make a snuff film. In fact, a priest of the church of Alcàsser got what is supposed to be a snuff film when a man went to the church for confession, then a friend of the parents of these girls received the alleged film given him by the priest, but the priest didn't reveal his identity because priest always keep confessions confidential. That friend is a criminologist who had been investigating everything since the first day because of the huge inconsistencies of the official story since the very beginning.

    In fact, that criminologist named Juan Ignacio Blanco wrote a book which was banned by the former government, (on which I will draw upon most of that thread), and he has been speaking nationwide - by using online radio, podcast and even by talks - in order to search the truth and to reveal to everyone how wrong the official story is. Unfortunately, he passed away because of cancer on July 2019. Well, that's the book in Spanish language:

    https://es.scribd.com/doc/118330287/...Ninas-Alcasser

    The so-called snuff film came to the knowledge of the Minister for Police by Juan Ignacio Blanco and one of the parents of the three teenage girls, just the most combative to find the truth, named Fernando García (father of Miriam García), but anyone never got an answer of it. There are some reports of people that could have seen the snuff film on the deep web, but hey, who knows!


    These are the three teenage girls who were savagely tortured to death:



    http://images.lainformacion.com/cms/...=lainformacion




    This is Miguel Ricart. He was sent to prison for more than twenty years and there were not hard evidences against him. Some of us in Spain often think that perhaps some police officers coerced him to create a false guilty. He was sent out of prison on late November 2013 because his sentence, (as many others too), was handed down by an European Court under what is known as the Spaniard Parot Doctrine:

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-Ne...#ixzz33ERscbor



    http://www.noticiasdenavarra.com/201...en-de-alcasser




    This is Antonio Anglés, a drug criminal who has been arrested 28 times before the Alcàsser murders. What's unexplainable he was able to fled from Valencia, Spain, to Lisbon, Portugal, without being arrested within the biggest raid ever in Spain.
    In fact, although police was breathing down his neck all the time whilst crossing the Iberian Peninsula from east to west (from Valencia to Lisbon), he was managed to flee as if he were Jason Bourne.
    So, his flee had allegedly started when some police officers arrived to his house the same day the human remains of the three teenagers were found. Then he kept hidden for nearly one month in the countryside of Valencia province. Then, he was near captured in Villamarchante, but he managed to escape, although there were a lot of police officers trying to arrest him as a big raid there. He was spotted a few days later in Minglanilla, the last place where, according to the official story, he was last seen in Spain by some witnesses. Then, in March 1993, he was seen again in Lisbon, Portugal. Police told he apparently embarked as a stowaway in a ship named 'City of Plymouth', and then he threw itself supposedly on having been discovered by the staff of the ship when travelling nearby the coast of Ireland. From there his track got lost forever. It is believed that he drowned in these cold waters, but until today nothing is known and his fate is unknown, so, as for today, he still remains unaccounted for.
    Some unofficial theories indicate that Antonio Anglés was killed at anytime during late 1992 or early 1993, then someone eventually acted or staged such amazing flee with the purpose of creating the myth of Antonio Anglés as the most dangerous person ever who every Spaniard must hate whilst trying to keep the real culprits free as a part of a cover-up.
    In fact, there were not any evidences against neither Antonio Anglés (nor Miguel Ricart) in the unused farmhouse of La Romana hills where the rape, torture and murders allegedly took place:



    https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...C8psqEISI0LfJQ




    This is Fernando García, the most combative one of the fathers of the teenage girls. He was in London on 27th January 1993 to show this case on British television; that day the three girls were found dead randomly by two beekeepers in a clandestine grave in a hilly, rugged, isolated field located between the villages of Catadau and Tous known as 'La Romana', which is located more than 30 kilometres away southwest from Alcàsser:



    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e3-TcWeaOp...Garcia+001.jpg



    There are some few Spaniards forums which contains some threads about this crime where the fake official story is undermined because it has a lot of strange inconsistencies, so we have been studying the matter in depth for years. All I want to do is to show you as English speakers how wrong the official story of that crime presumably is. Well, these are the threads in Spanish language:
    https://www.forocoches.com/foro/show...ghlight=<br />
    http://www.burbuja.info/inmobiliaria...casser-iv.html
    http://rumorologia.foroactivo.com/t2...as-de-alcasser

    Here you can see some other websites in Spanish language about this crime as well:

    http://elpalleter.orgfree.com/
    https://crimendealcasser.wordpress.com/
    https://sites.google.com/site/lawebdelassombras/enlaces
    https://elcrimendealcasser.wordpress.com/

    Finally, you can see some information about this crime in other languages. Please, if your native language is not Spanish, just help me to share this sad story by writing about this case, for instance in top crime blogs and forums in your own native language - whatever your language is - or by creating another Wikipedia article in your own language like these listed below that already exist. Thanks in advance:

    https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meurtres_d%27Alcàsser
    https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcasser_Mädchen
    https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_ragazze_di_Alcàsser
    https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_de_Alcácer
    https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Девушки_из_Алькассера


    I'm not fully fluent at writing English, but I will do my best.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 01:10 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418


    Well, let's get down to brass tacks.
    Friday afternoon, 13th November 1992. Three teenagers from Alcàsser named Antonia, (often referred as 'Toñi' as diminutive name), Miriam and Desirée, allegedly tried to go to a secondary school party which took place in the nearby town of Picassent, located about two kilometres away west from Alcàsser, but they never arrived at their destination.

    Whenever you see 'Alcácer' and 'Picasent' it means the names ot those two small cities in Spanish language; whereas 'Alcàsser' and 'Picassent' are the ones in Valencian language. Both are right.


    They also tried to convince one mate called Esther Diez (a 15-years-old girl) to join them, but she had flu-like symptoms so she refused their ongoing plan, so Esther finally decided to remain at home.
    However, Esther told the three girls had not a clear intention to go to the nightclub when they left her home.

    There is the first contradiction: Esther Diez testified that her friends have left her home at 20:15 or 20:20 according to her digital clock video, which is not the same that Esther's mother testified, who told the three girls left her home at 17:50, so there is a huge gap between what Esther and her mother told. Either if the three girls left Esther's house at 18:00 or at anytime between 20:15 to 20:20, then all the other eyewitnesses reports must be wrong by their alleged timelines.

    The next eyewitness was a teenage boy, called Francisco Antonio Soria, who saw them at 19:45 walking along a street in Alcàsser street. So, this doesn't match what both Esther and her mother told.

    The next eyewitness was a young man called Francisco José Hervás, who saw them waiting beside a traffic light at the outskirts of Alcàsser towards Picassent at 20:15. He was driving his own car accompanied by his girlfriend, called Maria Luz Lopez. He asked them where they're going, then he took them a ride for about 500 metres to the first streets of Picassent because some engine problem in his own car, so Francisco José stopped his car in the first petrol station at the entrance of Picassent, then he drove until the nearest car mechanic, so the three girls left out his car and allegedly continued on foot straight towards Coolor nightclub. Again, there is also another timeline gap with both Esther and her mother.

    There is another huge inconsistency: Francisco Jose said the girls were waiting beside a traffic light while doing hitch-hiking in a clear, direct way, instead of his girlfriend, Maria Luz Lopez, who said the three girls were hitch-hiking in secret as if they were somewhat shy. They both involving themselves in another contradiction later in May 1997, because Francisco Jose told the judge he was driving a gold-coloured Seat Ronda car, and his girlfriend said it was a white Ford Orion car. Also, it's hard to believe how a car mechanic may be open on Friday at 20:15. Oddly enough, the judge did not investigate those huge contradictions.
    Then, one of the lawyers asked about Francisco José's earlier criminal records, but that question was refused by the judge as inappropriate, therefore never answered so far.

    Once the three girls were on foot by the pavement of Picassent's high street heading toward Coolor nightclub, they were seen by another male mate of them called Jose Antonio Cano roughly at 20:20. He was riding his scooter going in the opposite direction of the three girls. Another contradiction: Few days later, Jose Antonio Cano told the police that he didn't see any car moving around the three girls. Five year later, he told the judge that he saw how a white small Opel car pass near the girls. Perhaps he was pressured by police to join 'the real truth', because according to the official story the three girls were kidnap by the drivers of a white Opel Corsa car.

    Then the last eyewitness was a 63-years-old woman called Maria Dolores Badal. She was at home, looking through a window watching people in the street at 20:00, when se saw how three girls were hitch-hiking until a white car stopped, and then they got into the car. So, she was able to see four unknown men inside the car.
    After Maria Dolores Badal, nobody saw them alive anymore. Oddly enough, the investigation refused those four unknown men as the perpetrators because the judge stated that there were just two perpetrators: Antonio Anglés and Miguel Ricart.

    She was the only eyewitness that testified more properly at the justice court - at least it was proved how her report made more sense than the ones of all the other eyewitnesses - except for a contradiction. She told she remembered that when she was seeing the teenage girls, the street lights switch on automatically, but at mid-November in eastern Spain (Valencia province) at 20:00 it got dark night. In fact, at that time of the year the sunset is 17:48, as explained in this link:

    The Weather Channel: pronóstico del tiempo nacional y local, huracanes, radar y reportes de weather.com

    Thus, whilst other friends of the three teenage girls were partying hard at Coolor nightclub for the secondary school party, when it was over they reported any of the three teenagers joined the party.

    According to the criminalistic man Juan Ignacio Blanco - who lived for more than a year in Alcasser with Fernando García, (father of Miriam García) for the purpose of investigating that stuff - an eyewitness of the girls, just Jose Antonio Cano, revealed him that he really did not seen the three girls the day of the disappearance.
    The official story always kept that the three girls tried to go straight on foot towards Coolor nightclub to enjoy the secondary school party, but according to most witnesses, they supposedly intended to do it at 20:00 or 20:15, when their fathers always put them a specific time to return back at home, just 21:30 h, so there was no time enough to enjoy the party and then walking down back home as long as two kilometres.
    They also haven't quite enough money to buy tickets at the door entrance, and they did not carry any presale tickets in their pockets.
    It's hard to believe why they intended to go to the secondary school party without having enough money nor presale tickets, as it could be highly likely that they could have buy presale tickets within the previous days at their school as many others really did within the previous days, but they didn't instead, so looks like that their timeline whilst trying to reach Coolor nightclub could be partly or even totally fake, or at least, the three teenage girls never tried to go to the secondary school party that evening, but to another - unknown - place.

    It's pretty strange why the police didn't ask the witnesses until seven days later to the disappearance, and even why was Francisco José Hervás the first one to report his statement if he is not a close friend of them, when it can be likely expected that Esther Díez - as the most close friend so far - may have been the first one.
    Did the police coerce all the witnesses after Esther Díez with the purpose of build a fake story trying to put the three girls heading Coolor nightclub when they really didn't instead? Some theories suggested so, but hey, who knows.
    http://es.scribd.com/doc/118330287/L...lcasser#scribd
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-11-2022 at 10:09 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    Now I show you a video which included the voice of one of the three teenage girls, just Antonia Gómez, who is often referred as "Toñi" as we Spaniards tend to use diminutive names so much.

    There was a radio station that operated Alcàsser area, so the previous day to the disappearance of the three teenage girls, - on Thursday 12th November 1992 at afternoon - Toñi rang a radio station to dedicate a song to her friends, just to Desirée, Miriam and some other friends as well.

    It was broadcasted on television three days later to the sad, macabre finding, just in a Spanish tv program called "Quién sabe donde" as a tribute to them.

    By the way she seemed to be happy, it could indicate how apparently she had not any accurate intention for a runaway by their own.
    She also said she had not clued of what kind of leisure plans she could have for the next day, so at that time she still didn't show any accurate intention to go to the secondary school party the next day.
    Let me show you the English translation:



    0:01-0:02. Speaker: Hey, Toñi, how is your Thursday evening going on?
    0:03. Toñi: It couldn't be better!
    0:04-0:07. Speaker: What are your plans for the weekend starting tomorrow?
    0:08. Toñi: I don't know.
    0:09. Speaker: So, looks like you don't know what to do the next weekend.
    0:09. Toñi: No, I don't know.
    0:10. Speaker: Anyway; I guess you won't stay at home.
    0:11. Toñi: Sure, you are right.
    0:12. Speaker: Yeah, there is no doubt about.
    0:13. Speaker: Hey, Toñi!
    0:14. Toñi: Yeah!
    0:15. Speaker: Just tell me what song you want to hear.
    0:16. Toñi: Peter Schilling...
    0:17. Speaker: Major Tom.
    0:18. Toñi: Yeah!
    0:19-0:20. Speaker: To whom is this song dedicated?
    0:21-0:25. Toñi: This song is dedicated to Isabel, to Miriam, to Desirée, to Ana, to Amaya...



    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xve...aricion_webcam
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 03:10 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    27th January 1993, sixty-five days later of the disappearance of the three girls.
    At that time, the whole country was very concerned by what could happen to the three teenage girls.


    Two beekeepers, called Gabriel Aquino and José Sala, decided to check their hives in a day of hives maintenance. Theirs hives were located in a hilly, isolated landscape called as 'La Romana' - which is difficult to hit by driving road-cars because of the lack of pavement with plenty of potholes all the way - located about 35 kilometres away southwest from Alcasser, just somewhere halfway between the villages of Catadau and Tous. So, it's just a bit off the beaten track.
    The beekeepers arrived to La Romana at 10:00, so they decided to wait for a while because the day was too cold to see the bees, as they are hidden into the hives to survive at low temperatures during early morning every winter.

    Gabriel Aquino was strolling around whilst waiting, and Jose Sala kept sitting on a stone beside the hives instead.
    Twenty minutes later, Gabriel Aquino found a suspicious thing between wild grass and bushes, just some removed soil and shrubs cuts into a pile. He shouted José Sala, so he ran fast to check what was going on there.

    They were very surprised at all, so José Sala took a hand tool and removed the cuts of shrubs. It was going to be the most horrible thing they ever have seen: A hand appearing out of the ground with a watch in it, likely the one of an adult man because it was a large hand, as they claimed later in the legal court.

    Then, they moved to the nearest Civil Guard police station to report their finding.
    Oddly enough, there were not any off-road vehicles available at the police station of Llombay, so they had to wait for two hours for an appropriate off-road car. Oddly enough, any off-road vehicle of the police came, in spite of there are some bigger towns near Llombay as was likely expected their bigger Civil Guard police stations could have some off-road cars available.

    Finally and according to the beekeeper Gabriel Aquino, a black road car came two hours later with two men wearing civilian clothes in it, so he went to La Romana being accompanied by these two men, whereas the other beekeeper Jose Salas had to wait more for the other off-road car to came back La Romana at anytime later. These two men who wore civilian clothes did not reveal their identities at that time, but several days later, according to a police report, they were Civil Guard police officers. The report also stated there weren't two policemen wearing civilian clothes, but three.

    There are more contradictions in another police reports owned by others police departments to describe what happened on Llombay's police station that day.

    It was known that the police officers of Alberique's Civil Guard police station received a phone call that day. According to their police report, any of two beekeepers came back to La Romana until they had been accompanying by the judge on duty.

    According to another report by the Civil Guard headquarters of Valencia, only one person went to La Romana to check himself the disturbing finding, just the captain of Alberique's police station.

    The other beekeeper, José Sala, in his first statement during the oral trial in May 1997, he claimed that he never split up of Gabriel Aquino that day, but both beekeepers stayed together all day long; he also had stated that the two beekeepers came back to La Romana with several policemen in an off-road car. Thus, he claimed that a few seconds after they hit La Romana, another off-road car had come with the judge on duty in it.
    Then, the judge ordered a face-to-face confrontation between the two beekeepers, and finally the judge stated Gabriel Aquino was right.

    Why these reports were probably fake? Was trying the police to build a official story to hide something who as a cover-up?
    Why did Jose Sala tell such a lie? Was he pressured by police as the last witnesses of the three girls Jose Antonio Cano probably was coerced too?

    Finally, according to Gabriel Aquino, he came back to La Romana hills with these two policemen in their road car. One of these policemen carried a bag.
    The last kilometre to hit La Romana is an unsurfaced road, then the road ends, so everyone trying to reach it by an off-road car must leave the car for the benefit of doing the last 70 metres on foot instead by walking through wild grass.

    Once Gabriel Aquino and the two policemen who wore civilian clothes hit La Romana to check the finding, with the clandestine ditch still unearthed, the policeman who carried a bag gave him a pair of surgical gloves, then the policeman suggested Gabriel Aquino and the other policeman to get around to find anything.
    At that time, the policemen who remained beside the clandestine grave took a deep look between scrublands and found himself some clothes, just some coats and belts.
    'These clothes belong to the Alcàsser teenage girls!' the policeman shouted.

    Why the policeman gave surgical gloves to Gabriel Aquino, as he's not a policeman but a beekeeper?
    Why he claimed these clothes belong to the three girls without checking what is located inside the clandestine ditch?
    Being a policeman who had to know previously something about the three teenagers, such as the clothes they wore when vanished, why did he fail with the clothes that the three girls wore when they vanished?



    Source: Juan Ignacio Blanco's book, pages 64 - 79.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-08-2022 at 07:03 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    27th January 1993 afternoon in La Romana hills.

    The beekeepers Gabriel Aquino and these two policemen wearing civilian clothes were waiting for the judge on duty to check and exhume the finding. As aforementioned, one policeman found some coats and belts between scrublands.


    A few minutes later, Gabriel Aquino found some small, broken pieces of paper on the soil, which were put together to read it. They realized it was a medical paper piece that indicate the date of entry to La Fe hospital, who belonged to Enrique Anglés, one of the brothers of Antonio Anglés.

    Enrique Anglés allegedly was a person of interest within the earliest stages of the investigation, but police never found any hard evidences against him, so it was concluded that Antonio Anglés and Miguel Ricart were accompanied by an unknown person, according to the official story.
    Enrique Angles was a mischievous man as he lived in a troubled family, but he was never involved in any criminal offence.

    It's indeed hard to believe that these pieces of paper could remain stuck there from mid-November to late January, being exposed at rain showers and strong wind.
    Thus, Gabriel Aquino said there was too much rain during the two previous months ending of 27 January, as he is a beekeeper man of the countryside
    who are often aware of weather conditions.
    So, did someone put these pieces of paper there on purpose?


    Two hours later, two off-road cars of the Civil Guard police arrived separately from each other.
    They arrived sooner than the judge on duty car, who should be led in the journey by the another beekeeper, José Sala, to reach the fairly isolated, remote location of La Romana.
    How did these two police cars reach the remote area of La Romana without anybody's help?

    Let me emphasize that the road car of the two policemen who wore civilian clothes had no distinctive police marks according to what the beekeeper Gabriel Aquino said.
    Considering that between the place that Gabriel Aquino indicated to park the road car - driving by one of the policemen - to the human remains that were not accessible by most motor vehicles, (up until today it continues this way), there was more than 70 metres of wood.
    How did they reach on foot the human remains without getting lost there?

    People might think that since the very beginning the police was trying to lead the investigation into the fake official story, as their work wasn't fair, but biased.

    After a while, finally the justice on duty arrived to La Romana hills, being led by the another beekeeper who is called José Sala.

    Source: Juan Ignacio Blanco book's, pages 92 - 117.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 03:21 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    27th January 1993 at afternoon.

    Gabriel Aquino and the two policemen who wore civilian clothes had been waiting for almost three hours until the judge on duty arrived at 17:00 being led by José Sala, so the visual inspection began quickly before it got dark.

    According to the judicial assistant, there were found seventeen objects around the human remains:

    A white sock.
    A denim jacket, Liberto brand.
    A cotton T-shirt.
    A small binocular inside a holster.
    A glove.
    Three belts.
    A hair spray bottle.
    A hair mousse bottle.
    An audio cassette tape of Antonio Machín.
    A medical drug package, Zantac brand.
    Two medical drug packages, Urbal brand.
    A dark red pair of wool socks.
    A bottle, Aután brand.
    A bottle of hair dye, Imedia brand.
    An empty tin of olives, as well as a video game.
    A piece of paper which apparently contains a name.


    This is what they had seen inside the grave:
    Firstly, seven things were found above the bodies.
    Two stones shrouded into a T-shirt. Two wooden logs; one of them being triangular-shaped, whilst the another one being rectangular-shaped with a rope attached to the end.
    A dark green jacket.
    A hand was found; some fingers had some skin in it, whereas some others appeared skinless.
    A body with its hands tied, with her head detached from the body and the upper body appeared quite decayed.
    There was a carpet which couldn't been taken out of the grave at that time, but later.
    Another head detached's body.
    The head of the first body.
    The head of the second body.
    The third body with her head hugely deformed.
    The carpet was removed out of the grave.
    The three bodies appeared wearing their own clothes.
    Finally, the forensic doctor took a visual inspection to concluded that there were found three bodies who belong to three female young.



    According to what one of the Civil Guard police officers wrote, there were huge contradictions with the previous one of the judicial assistant:

    There were founds twenty-three objects around there:
    A piece of paper.
    A black case containing binoculars, Tasco brand.
    Three belts.
    A blue glove.
    A pair of burgundy coloured socks.
    A white sock.
    A portable game machine, High Way brand.
    A white box containing some plasters.
    A package containing some medical drug pills, Zantac brand.
    A bottle for pest control, Autan brand.
    A hair mousse bottle.
    A hair spray, Sudanesa brand.
    Some cotton.
    Two packages of medical drugs, Urbal brand.
    A instruction manual for an audio cassette, General Electric brand.
    A bottle of hair dye, Imedia brand.
    A broken white plastic spoon.
    A denim jacket, Liberto brand.
    A pullover.
    An audio cassette tape of Antonio Machín.
    A motorbike fairing sticker with the inscription 600 Super SP in it.

    There were also some huge contradictions with what the Civil Guard police had seen in the clandestine grave:
    The second body had not her left hand.
    The third body had not her right hand.
    The two stones shrouded into a T-shirt, the two wooden logs, the rope and a dark corduroy jacket all appeared under the bodies at the bottom of the hole.
    There was a dark brown carpet at the bottom of the grave.


    There were more huge contradictions between the people was there.
    According to what the worker of the funeral services said on oral trial:

    One body was found without one hand.
    There was a blue carpet at the bottom of the clandestine grave.
    The clock that the two beekeepers had seen was not in plain sight emerging above the ground, but buried.



    Again more huge contradictions. This is what the first beekeepers, Gabriel Aquino, said on justice court:

    He did not see the stones, neither the two wooden logs, neither the dark green jacket.
    He did remember how the first body had her head detached, but he didn't recall if the another two bodies were led out being detached to their heads.
    Nobody was there taking pictures of it.
    Nobody there was writing the alleged two reports of the Civil Guard police nor the one of the judicial assistant.
    He didn't remember there was any forensic doctor.


    Why did they constantly keep contradicting themselves?
    Looks like each one of them were in different clandestine graves or reporting different human remains!


    http://webs.demasiado.com/elpalleter/qpa03.htm

    Another strange thing happened nearby the clandestine grave that day. As all the Spaniard media coverage made a great deal of it, some local journalist have tried to hit the clandestine grave to take some pictures of it. That's the way the local newspaper which is called as 'Las Provincias' did that, but once there, those beekeepers and one policemen shouted at them moving themselves the way back. At least one of these journalist took a picture of it, in which in the foreground there is a person in a threatening position, and some people think that person could be Emilio Jambrina, a high-ranking Spaniard intelligence officer.
    Well, this conclusion was reached for some members users of these Spaniard forums I posted at the end of the first post, but whatever.
    Spaniard police never confirm nor deny the identity of that man.

    This was the odd picture:



    http://lawebdelassombras.blogspot.co...meneros-2.html

    Here is a portrait picture of Emilio Jambrina. What do you think?:



    Source: Juan Ignacio Blanco book's, pages 92 - 117.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 03:28 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    27th January 1993 at afternoon.

    Surprisingly, there was a crime scene photographer policeman, called Rivas, who did not take any picture of these stones or wooden logs that were found in the clandestine grave.
    He also did not take any picture of the position that the three bodies had when unearthed in the grave, but outside.

    The two stones were lost by the Civil Guard policemen, so it was such a big mistake because these two stones could have been examined later to know whether they belonged to La Romana's environment or not.

    According to what the forensic doctor -called Ros - told in the justice court in 1997, the second body was skeletonized; the second and third bodies appeared there with all their hands, instead to the Civil Guard police report that was different.
    When he was narrating in the court the way they removed the corpses from the grave, he also told, as I quote: 'At that time, I had a clear instruction...'
    Given this quote, it would be worth to know if anyone had been ordering him some instructions about how to proceed there. Did a senior police officer advise him to hide the truth?


    As you can see, I've told you the way how the appearance of the corpses of the three girls was managed.
    Now I will tell you the story of how the arrest warrant of Miguel Ricart happened in the afternoon of that day, 27th January 1993.

    Once one member of the Civil Guard police found there some small, broken parts of paper from a medical prescription with the name of Enrique Anglés - one of the several brothers of Antonio Anglés - in it, he suddenly went to the police station to held a police raid at the Anglés family home.

    Please, mind that according to the judicial assistant there were not any broken pieces of paper around the clandestine grave.

    Why an alleged killer had carried a medical prescription of his brother in its pocket to leave it there?
    How can some small pieces on paper remain there for more than two months without being blow away by wind gusts or deteriorated by water damage because of rains? It does not make any sense!


    Once the police raid arrived at Anglés family home, who lived in a town called Catarroja, (just on the fourth floor at street Camí Real, number 101), the inhabitants of the house blocked the entrance, so one policeman went to the judge to get a court eviction to enter in their house.
    At that time, the other police officers stayed there surrounding the house to prevent nobody to leave it.
    In that brief period of time, Antonio Anglés, (who allegedly was inside the house), fled after jumping from one of his windows.
    It is difficult to understand how he was able to jump nine metres in a diagonal angle to the powder-coated roof located on the second floor, being at risk of having damage in his own legs.

    As the next image shows, this is how Antonio Anglés could allegedly flee home by doing a jump out from the windows coloured red to the coated roof coloured in blue:



    http://tecnicopreocupado.com/2014/03...-jason-bourne/

    Nobody who had read about this horrible crime trust that official history about Antonio Anglés fleeing home this way.

    Once Antonio Anglés supposedly jumped out and ran away without having been seen by those policemen that were surrounding the building, the police officer came back with the court eviction with the right to enter their house.

    So, there were four residents at the house:
    Dolores Anglés, (who is sister of Antonio Anglés, often called as "Kelly" as a nickname).
    Jose Antonio García (who is Dolores Anglés' boyfriend).
    Enrique Anglés (who is a brother of Antonio Anglés).
    Neusa Martins (who is the mother of Antonio Anglés).
    Every one of them always agreed before the judge that Antonio Anglés was there and jumped out before police entered the house.

    As the medical prospection paper located near the clandestine grave included the name of Enrique Anglés, he was arrested by the police for alleged murder, and he used his right to testify nothing.
    Dolores Anglés and Jose Antonio Garcia were also arrested for testify at the police station.

    A few minutes later, according to what Miguel Ricart agreed before the judge, several persons came to the house. Miguel Ricart, Ricardo Anglés (who is a brother of Antonio Anglés) and Mauricio Anglés (who is another brother of Antonio Anglés).
    At that time, Miguel Ricart usually was living in Anglés family house because of bad relationships with its girlfriend.
    He said that there were some police cars, so he feared nothing, so he entered to their house because he was not under warrant.
    Once Miguel Ricart entered to the house, he was immediately handcuffed backs to the wall.

    According to what Mauricio Anglés and Ricardo Anglés told before the judge, they were the tree persons that entered the house after police has been already in the house.

    According to the police report, once they have entered their house looking for Enrique Anglés, the two brothers of Antonio didn't enter the house, but Miguel Ricart alone.

    Thus, other strange facts happened there:

    According to the written report of the Civil Guard police, the phone rang and then a nervous male voice sent a voice message to the answerphone, as follows:
    :'*Kelly, It's *Ruben. Once you have arrived home, just tell *the blonde to go to the place where the motorbike chain wheel and the motorbike handlebar are located from, and told him to take two sleeping bags; also some Kellog's breakfast cereal and some milk which are located on the fridge as well, just as soon as possible. Bye!'

    * 'Kelly' is a nickname of Dolores Anglés, the sister of Antonio Anglés.
    * 'Ruben' is a nickname of Antonio Anglés. Apparently, Antonio Anglés also had another nicknames like 'Asukiki' and 'Sugar'.
    * 'The blonde' is a nickname of Miguel Ricart as he usually had natural blonde hair, although it was known he dyed his natural blonde hair to black those days.


    The audio tape that contains this voice message was the only thing confiscated by the police at Angles family house that day.
    According to this confiscated tape, this is what the male voice was saying calmly: 'Kelly, I'm Ruben, once you come tell the blonde to go to the place where the motorbike chain wheel and the motorbike handlebar are located from, and I need also the two sleeping bags, some Kellog's breakfast cereal and some milk located above the freezer; just as soon as possible. Bye!'

    Secondly, as Mauricio Anglés told before the judge four years later - even tough according to police report he didn't come to the house that day - he reported he had blonde hair but dyed to black later to avoid being recognised since Miguel Ricart and himself have been robbery a bank few days ago. In fact, that's the reason Miguel Ricart turn its blonde natural hair to black.

    According to the police officer, the only person that came into the house once the investigation had begun was Miguel Ricart, and that its hair was blonde.
    Once the preliminary investigation finished, three persons were sent to the police station: Dolores Anglés, Jose Antonio García and Miguel Ricart, and the only one that remained free at the house was Neusa Martins.

    According to Mauricio Anglés, those who remained free in the house were himself, Ricardo Anglés and his mother Neusa Martins.

    Once in the police station, the first who testified was Dolores Anglés, who told that Enrique Anglés has some mental disorders but also that he is definitely not a dangerous guy.

    Meanwhile, Miguel Ricart was held in an isolated room, and at that time police began to check its own car (a white coloured Opel Corsa) without even been asked at police station.
    Once the car investigation finished, police began to suggest Miguel Ricart's car was used to kidnap the three teenage girls, and that's the way police asked him in its preliminary police interrogation.

    After Miguel Ricart interrogation, when he said he still was imprisoned on 13th November 1992, (the day of the disappearance of the three girls), police rang the prison to check if it was true or not, so the reply they receive was that Miguel Ricart was indeed imprisoned on 13th November 1992.

    Oddly enough, those policemen of Civil Guard didn't trust the reply they got from the prison and then some policemen moved to the jail, located near the city of Valencia, to check it again by themselves.
    Finally, they did come back to the police station with a writing report that shows that Miguel Ricart was not imprisoned on 13th November 1992, but free.

    So, twelve hours later of the appearance of the girls, two persons were under preventive arrest without having any strong evidence against them, nor even a weak evidence.
    Miguel Ricart will remain as a murder suspect forever, whilst Enrique Anglés would be sent out of prison a few hours later.


    How could police commit such mistakes?
    Why the police acted as if they were rushing quickly to find a guilty without any warranties nor evidences against him?


    Source: Juan Ignacio Blanco book's pages 133 - 149.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 03:37 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    28th January 1993. The three autopsies were performed, being the first the one of Toñi.

    According to the autopsy results, all these things were observed at first glance:


    The head was separated from the body.
    The arms were turned on back and her hands were tied with an elastic bandage.
    Her body was soaked in soil with few insects larvae.
    Her left forearm appears detached from the elbow with some lack of muscle mass too.
    Both left ribs and left shoulder were detached.
    Hole in the chest that was big enough to see the internal parts of her body.

    This is the list of the clothes that she wore:
    A light-coloured jacket.
    A light-coloured T-shirt.
    A white bra attached right.
    A pair of blue jeans attached right.
    Female pants as underwear.
    A brown belt attached right.
    A couple of purple socks.
    A pair of brown boots.
    A golden ring with turquoise stone in it.
    A silver-coloured watch.
    Eight coins.
    A pink lipstick.
    A piece of white elastic bandage with a red border in it.

    As you can see, the forensics have stated as one of her own clothes the white elastic bandage which kept her hands tied up!
    What a crazy statement!

    Later conclusions:


    The corpse did show an advanced level of decay.
    A large extent of skin around her neck and her breast was removed. The forensic doctors said it was by animal actions, whereas the rest of her skin was right, except her head, which appeared in a very high degree of skeletonization.

    What kind of animal is able to remove these specific parts of a buried corpse? These forensic doctors were never able to give a scientific explanation!
    Why these forensics were unable to explain how its head was highly skeletonized whilst the rest of the body didn't show skeletonization?


    Then, according to the forensic results, the forensics washed the body with water at a high speed without having been previously removed any larvae nor traces of mud coming from the clandestine grave, so by doing that they presumably destroyed some other evidences of the murderers such as traces of DNA, semen, hair, etc.
    The other two corpses were washed too.

    So, this is just a negligent work for forensic doctors! They have been deliberately obstructed the ongoing investigation by manipulating everything!


    Once the forensics began to wash Toñi's body, they noticed how her body had shown some injuries:

    A round bruise in the rear of the left arm measuring four centimetres both in length and width.
    A wound in the left wrist area which measures one and a half centimetre in width without any trace of bleeding.
    An elliptical bruise in the back of the right shoulder which measures ten centimetres in diameter.
    A prominent bruise in the upper right arm which measures four centimetres in length and 2 centimetres in width.

    A wound in the right wrist area which measures one and a half centimetre in width without any trace of bleeding.
    A round bruise located at the 10th dorsal vertebra which measures three centimetres.
    A round bruise in the back of the left leg which measures one centimetre in diameter.
    A square bruise in the inner side of the left thigh.
    A prominent bruise in the front side of the left which measures eight centimetres in length and two centimetres in width.
    Many others small bruises around her back and both lower and upper extremities.
    An entry bullet hole in the head by a gunshot which had not exit hole.
    Traces of bleeding in the inner side of her right eye socket.
    Two incisors were removed from the upper jaw.
    One right premolar and one left premolar were removed from the lower jaw.
    Some traces of mineral grains in the incisors from the lower jaw which could have entered her mouth by having been previously buried in a calcareous soil.

    All of them were supposedly made by several objects which vary in their shape, form and consistency.
    Those wounds located on both wrists indicated low blood pressure, so her hands were presumably tied for a few moments before dead, just within the dying process.
    The missing dental pieces could not be found in the clandestine grave nor around it.


    At that point, the forensics began to check the internal parts of the body.

    The inside of her head was just melted down as a fluid due to putrefaction.
    A bullet was found near the inner side of the right eye socket.
    Prominent traces of bleeding between the second and the fourth right dorsal vertebrae.
    Six dorsal vertebrae were found detached to the vertebral column.
    Heart and lungs were indistinguishable as they formed a meltdown fluid.
    Even tough most of the abdominal area did show an advanced degree of putrefaction, the stomach didn't show an advanced degree of decay at all; thus, they found a strange orange fluid in it.

    Everyone had expected from forensics working properly that such orange fluid have to be sent for comprehensive analysis, but they didn't.

    Then, the forensic performed a genital exam:

    When she already died, someone raped her anus as a huge anal dilation could be made with an object that had not any sharp edges (as the inside of the anus was not injured).
    Her vaginal area was fine, so she did not lose her virginity.

    Then the forensic doctors remove and sent some samples for comprehensive analysis to the Toxicology Institute of Spain.
    These were the samples:

    Two pieces of the right wrist.
    Both her left and right hand.
    A piece of perineal area.
    Her skull.
    Her underwear pants.

    Whiting the autopsy there was a Civil Guard policeman doing a photograph report.
    According to what the policeman told before the judge later in 1997, he only took those photos that those forensic doctors ordered him to do so.
    According to the forensic doctors, they told him nothing about the matter, so the policeman was free to did his photograph report the way he did want.

    Then, the forensics agreed that it would be useful to create a brief outline of all those pictures by choosing few of them, whilst the rest of the photos have to remain stored in a box.
    There were four persons taking pictures and neither of all those pictures were included in the case file.
    The Civil Guard police has filmed two videos as well, but were not included in the case file either.

    Finally, the forensics reached the conclusions listed below:


    It was a violent death by destruction of brain vital centres because of a gunshot entering the head at left temporoparietal level.
    The entry hole of the gunshot had elliptical morphology, measuring 1.3 cm and 0.9 centimetres. Its trajectory was from back to front, from left to right, slightly downward.
    It couldn't be determined the distance from which the gunshot was fired from, but likely at close range.
    The corpse had bruises everywhere.
    A huge anal dilation which was made when she had already died.
    There were strong evidences that someone had tied their hands when she was suffering her dying process.
    The estimate date of death was two months ago or so prior to the date of autopsy.
    There was a lot of animal action in her body which caused that a large part of her skin over her breast was removed despite she had been buried.


    Source: Juan Ignacio Blanco book's, pages 155 - 165.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 04-25-2021 at 03:47 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    I want to share with you this interview to Marc Romero, who is the film director of '75 días', just a film about this case which will be release in late 2018 or early 2019. I can't wait for it!:

    1. How did you decide about make a true-crime film of The Alcàsser Murders?

    Well, I studied at the Shakespeare Foundation of Madrid, which had an office in Valencia. Alejo Sauras and I moved to Valencia with the director of the foundation just for a discussion meeting or something like that. My brother, named José Manuel Pozueco Romero, studied Psychology and Criminology in Valencia. After finishing his careers, he wrote, possibly, the best research work of criminal psychopathology ever in Europe. He had been working into the Picassent prison and others prisons as well. When he started working, he had collaborated with correctional institutions, checking psychological profiles, making evaluations of prisoners to allow them to obtain temporary release, interviewing very dangerous criminals and, of course, working on The Alcàsser Girls case.

    So, I will come back when Alejo Sauras and I moved to Valencia. Taking advantage of my work trip, I went to see my brother and stayed there for a few days. It was summer, so I wanted to go to the beach, but my brother did not join me because he was getting busy at work. So, I told him to give me a book to read something while sunbathing. I remember how that day I came back home without tanning, although I went to Malvarrosa beach. He just gave me the whole Alcàsser case file, including the profiles from both Antonio Anglés and Miguel Ricart he did and the different autopsy reports of all the forensics doctors that participated in it as well.

    I had never been interested from the cinematographic point of view to film a drama and, not to mention, inspired by a true crime. I had worked in comedy films instead, as I liked them. I had just led Antonia San Juan, Silvia Marsó and Fernando Guillén with an historical period film.
    So, that day, when I returned from the beach, the Alcàsser case became fascinating for me. We almost agreed a film with Filmax and with another film company, but it wasn't successful.

    Recently, my brother died of cancer for smoking in his forties leaving me a great legacy of books, so I decided to make this film as a tribute for him.


    2. Has it been complicated to compile information to carry forward the story?

    Yes, it has been very complicated. I just had finished reading the case file, police statements, dockets, etc. Anyway, like many people who have been previously interested in this case, I had more doubts, so I felt a need to know more about. I became interested to read the alternative case file which is different from the main one, just the so-called 'B case file'. I had to know the name of all the suspects that had been investigated about the extra hairs located over the bodies. We already knew what the court stated: 'They did the crime alone by themselves or perhaps being helped by others'. Even the judge, after reviewing everything, had no choice but had to admit the strong evidence: There were more people involved in the murders.
    It is also true that the media coverage did not help the citizens to trust in justice. I understand that the judge couldn't carry on the 'B case file' which was created to investigate the hairs of at least five people different from the two alleged culprits.
    So, I was willing to know who are those people, then I got a copy of the 'B case file', as someone put it into my mailbox.



    3. What were the main obstacles you had to overcome with?

    I don't know how to begin.
    Once I have finished studying the case file and I began to draw what would be the structure of the film script, I realized that it was time to ask all the people related to the murders. The case file is just nonsense, so I needed those people who appeared in the reports to clarify me why they told contradictory statements. Did people noticed that there were three families looking for justice?

    It is impossible that a traumatic event such as finding a hand in the middle of the woods lead to a never-ending circle of different versions. I mean the beekeepers who find the corpses, of course. If I found a hand emerging from the ground among scrub, first I would faint, then, after recovering for the shock, I will have been moving to the next Civil Guard police station to report the finding, but I will never ever hesitate about the shape of the hand I have previously seen. Even being asked during the rest of my life I would always say the same thing, mostly because such macabre things are never forgotten because we are not used to seeing them daily.

    The obstacles that we have encountered have to do with pick who told the truth and who lies. We all know forums on the internet that defend the official story and others that defend alternative theories.
    So I ask myself, does make sense to defend something that was already judged by the court, and therefore you agree that it was judged properly? It makes no sense. Now, I also have to say that there are few unofficial theories that make no sense at all.



    4. Who is the most interested person to avoid the leak of this issue?

    I don't know as I'm not a detective. The only thing I agree is that when in such a case there is a struggle of different people with huge ego, the harmed ones are the families. No one will be able to admit their mistakes. There are arrogant people who believe they are the best as they believe they don't need to render accounts, and they are wrong.
    Everyone who work as civil servant must answer people's questions.


    We have recently seen a series about the flee of Anglés which is pretty interesting.
    When a journalist from TV make an interview to a gentleman-thief like Rafael Vera, as if he is a person whom people trust, it is something wrong. Mind that he swindled our entire country so far! Mind that he is one of those culprits for the kidnap of Segundo Marey and was involved on 'GAL' affaire too! Where the hell is our historical consciousness?
    The journalist Jordi González was banned from La Noria program in Telecinco TV channel for something that was much less serious, just because the mother of 'El Cuco' received some money for an interview, when the mother was not responsible for what her son did, but we the Spaniards, like Hamlet, got furious and claimed for the ban of the entire TV program.

    Do you think that given the circumstances there would be someone interested to know the truth?



    5. In your opinion, what about the whereabouts of Miguel Ricart?

    We really know about his current whereabouts, so it's not a mystery. He has met a person and forgotten his earlier promises. Once he left jail, he told he has to clean his name and make up for lost time with his daughter as well.
    Actually it's more than four years and yet his promises has not been accomplished. Her daughter asked me if I knew her father's whereabouts as she had the right to know him. In fact, she was a baby when the murders happened.
    The only thing I assure you is that he is still alive and has changed his own identity. Let's see if both 'Bambú Producciones' television network and Netflix are ready to find out his whereabouts and ask him some questions, as they told they will have all the statements in the TV series they are working for. We won't make it easy for them.



    6. Have you been able to ask either Fernando García, Juan Ignacio Blanco or the forensic doctor named Frontela?

    Yes, we have. We really have requested all of them, and the one that didn't reply to us is because he didn't want to do so. I don't want to discuss who did reply to us and who didn't.
    Anyway, I will say there is someone who I really appreciate so much. I mean the little brother of Miriam García. I was very interested in the opinion of an 8-year-old boy, as he was this age when his sister disappeared. We all know the struggle Fernando García faced with during all these years, but we also know that he was convicted for slander and libel, so I will discuss that later.
    Going back to Miriam's little brother by knowing his own opinion, which we have never heard before, is something that would make the film more credible, just because he is an anonymous person and by his age nobody can report him based on alleged lies. He really bared his soul to us, which make everything very easy for us. In fact, he refuted some stories that most of us have believed before, even he denied some facts that his father had previously told. A harmless 8-year-old boy who suddenly was forced by circumstances to cope a traumatic event given his young age, I guess is someone who people really trust for sure.

    We also asked several police officers, so most of them agreed the fact that there are more people involved in this crime who are still not charged.

    We also have collected some statements of other people such as lovers, prisoners, doctors, partners, etc.


    7. Have you ever been threatened because of this film?

    Yes, I have been threatened.



    8. Why the mass media is trying to imply that the film is based on the official story?

    I don't know the reason. Even I would say mass media doesn't imply such fact at all. Anyway, it is too early to know how the mass media will react to the preview.
    You also belong to the mass media as well, so you are going to show my point of view for the people.



    9. How complicated was to manage the film, including economically wise?

    It was very complicated, and still it is. It is very difficult to get support of the public institutions for this film, mostly because they don't know how to justify that they would support such a film based on the spookiest crime happened in this country. Public finance should not go to these projects, so it is better to use it to finance corrupt politicians.

    We have not invented this genre, it already existed. Does anyone remember the Spaniard TV series named 'La Huella del Crimen'? Millions of spectators gathered while watching the worst misfortune.
    I still remember the sentence 'The history of a country is also the history of its crimes'. With that proverb was presented an ambitious program of 'Tve' Spaniard TV channel in 1985 that sought to satirize some of the most famous crimes in the history of Spain.
    Now we are turning the clock back. All the politicians steal us and we say nothing. A film about Alcàsser crime is being carried on, then there have been many controversies.

    Remember when during the peak of evictions by the economic crisis there was a film called 'Techo y Comida'.
    The film did not receive public finance. How could the government support a film which showed people being expelling from their properties with the complicity of banks and government?

    In spite of this, that film was a success and won the Goya award for best actress.


    10. Do you expect some kind of boycott for the preview?

    Yes, we expect so, but we will hit back.



    11. Which is the reason to cover what happened in Alcàsser?

    I guess nobody is ready to admit their own mistakes. I spoke before about the struggle of different people by their huge egos. There was enough controversy in it. Too much people joined the trial for being popular prosecutors like people that have a go at anything.
    I understand that there were associations, which at that time were not very well known, and this was their way to become social climbers.
    As soon as the bodies of the girls were found, there was a long list of people who had voluntarily joined to participate in the trial. I think it would have been better if all these people had been designated by the competent court authority. Now, if I go like I owned the place and ask to lead the trial, then I shouldn't bother when someone recriminates my mistakes.

    I will come back to the subject of Fernando García. Today, he is paying for his judgement when Miguel Ricart is already a free man, and even when Rafael Vera, much more a thief than him, is a free man too.

    I agree what the judge states against Fernando García because he committed insults and slander, but that a thief, a kidnapper and someone who lead the 'GAL' affaire was pardoned by the primer minister José María Aznar and that the man who has lost everything by the triple crime, I think it is a strong reason for us as Spaniards to take the street, same than we did before when the demonstrations against the Iraq war. Fernando García has apologized to those people he insulted and didn't get a pardon by any of the prime ministers we have had until today, but the legal prosecutor of the National High Court says that what the former Secretary of State for Security one day told during the government of Felipe González, I mean Rafael Vera, who claimed that the 'GAL' affaire was somewhat successful and that it wasn't a crime at all.



    12. Did you ever think about leaving the film project?

    Yes, I did. In fact, I was thinking so about 100 times per second. When you get involved on such a story like this, you can figure out how deeply involved you can get, but you don't know when the film will be over.
    We are not taking risk, but we want to show our work to everyone; I just want to be fair and say that 25 years later our armed police units have changed. Actually we can not blame them for the mistakes that others did in the past.

    13. What will we see on your film named '75 días'?

    We will see how the life of a quiet town suddenly changed by the disappearance of three children. We will know the truth about both Miguel Ricart and Antonio Anglés. Not only that, but we will see how some parents got really struggled to find the truth.
    Everyone will realize how wrong the corpses were removed and how the site of human remains crime had been tampered. You will be able to see some statements that have never been collected into any report and are not part of the case file. We will show you the mismatch between the different autopsies and how the clothes of the victims, (previously soaked in water and then placed in plastic bags), were given to the forensic doctor Frontela.
    We will show you how the hairs found over the bodies of the girls, just hairs of at least 5 different people (including either pubic hairs, grey hairs, etc), weren't checked.

    It will reveal, once and for all, where the girls went on the evening of their disappearance and what they were talking about with their friend that was sick at the moment.
    You will also know the identity of the stowaway man of City of Plymouth ship and what the captain was talking to him.
    It is not true that the police never asked the captain. What a lie!
    The captain was interrogated either by the Interpol and by the Spanish police who went to Ireland and showed him several pictures of Anglés showing different looks, even when some TV shows told us the opposite. We will see how the real flee of Antonio Anglés took place and who helped him along the way.

    Finally, we will also show you how the trial was conducted for with contradictions, lies, manipulations, unlikely statements, etc.

    Actually I can't reveal more because I'm afraid I'm talking too much.



    14. Do you think that this film will imply to reopen the investigation of this case, even by an unofficial way?

    If Fernando Garcia receives pardon and the Civil Guard police got the order to investigate the alternative case file of Alcàsser, then it would have been worthy. Therefore, I would like it to be done unofficially and by the current Civil Guard police officers without restrictions. It is not mandatory for everyone to know all the steps they would take. I really think that if the Civil Guard receive the order to work on the alternative 'B case file', many riddles that are still unsolved will be unraveled.
    Back in those years there was the 'Corcuera law' in force, which allowed that the police have the right to enter any private premises if there was the suspicion of serious crime. Such law was used so many times, even in the private premises of people from the ruling class. And that's all I can say on the matter...




    15. In your opinion, what about the burst of disappeared girls which happened during the late 80s and early 90s?

    I have no idea. I don't know much about other cases. People are wrong when they ask me about such other disappearances. I am not a specialist degree on this subject, so I don't want to bring all the crimes of this country to the cinema.
    Once I have finished this film, I will write a comedy, or perhaps I would eventually move to Brussels...



    16. Do you notice that, after the Alcàsser girls, other disappearances of more than two girls at once never happened again? If so, would it be that obvious?

    I don't know what to think about.



    17. Where will the film setting take place?

    I won't reveal it, as we want to avoid boycotts this way. We have already begun to film some scenes inside, and we are so happy with that, including our the cast of players as well. We are promoting the film, so it will be available nationwide in Spain at the end of the current year. We are negotiating with some TV channels for its release in 2018 as well.



    19. Who is your biggest supporter on this matter?

    Our biggest supporter are our own families, of course. Those actors who have performed their character without being worried if the story should be released or not as well.



    20. Finally, Marc, we appreciate you for your kindness. Now we allow you to add whatever you want.

    I would like to advise either the spectators and my workmates to leave their own prejudices to watch the film. They should care about don't forget the past and learn from it. Thank you very much.

    Source in Spanish:
    http://yonocompropan.com/entrevista-...imen-alcasser/
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 05-04-2021 at 11:00 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Frequent Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Spain, Europe
    Posts
    418
    Today I want to show you some new updates:

    https://www.lasexta.com/programas/eq...9a99fdeeb.html

    It is a program broadcasted a month ago on La Sexta TV channel, which is a nationwide Spaniard channel, therefore is in Spanish language.

    It is about the way Antonio Anglés eventually was able to flee from his hometown, named Catarroja, (south of Valencia), to the coast of Ireland, and it contains interviews of more than 20 eyewitnesses who allegedly had seen him within his rather unbelievable flee, and it included some new facts we have never heard before, so I will show you by following the chronological order:

    1. Dolores Anglés is the sister of Antonio Anglés who lives right now in New York, so she allowed an interview by phone with the journalist.
    She told how she helped his brother by using a bedsheet from their window rather than jumping in an oblique angle from their 4th floor to the nearest roof.
    Why is the reason to reveal that 25 years later?
    I personally think that leaving a house through a window by using a bedsheet is not a fast way to escape, but a slow one, so a given neighbour could have seen him doing so, but apparently no one saw him.

    2. The driver of the taxi who took him from Catarroja to Turís, (which happened one hour after his jump), told how he was able to see how Antonio Anglés had a shoebox which accidentally opened and showed a revolver and a lot of money as well.
    Back in January 1993, when the police asked that taxi driver if Antonio Anglés carried a gun, he said 'no, he didn't'.
    Thus, it would be difficult to escape through a 4th floor window by the bedsheet using the hands while carrying a full shoebox with money and a revolver.
    According to the official story, the only gun Antonio Anglés had been a 9 mm one he had stolen to a city police a few months earlier.

    3. On 28th January at noon, less than 24 hours after the beginning of his flee, he went to a hairdresser located at the city centre of Valencia rather than keep hiding somewhere else.
    Even so, according to the interview of one woman who worked there that day, Antonio Anglés was flirting with her an even tried a date, but she refused.
    Anyway, it doesn't make sense for the most wanted man ever in Spain trying to date women this way.

    4. A gipsy woman accused him that Antonio Anglés eventually tried to kidnap his little girl. It happened when Antonio Anglés kept hiding near a train station in the countryside where he and Miguel Ricart used to live at times before the crime in some unused buildings.
    In 1993 the gypsies told nothing about the attempt to kidnap their little daughter, but only that Antonio Anglés went there to buy a car to her husband, although the husband didn't sell it.

    5. The captain of City of Plymouth, the ship that went from Lisbon to Dublin, (where Antonio Anglés allegedly travelled as a stowaway), told the journalist that once they approached the Irish coast, the Irish police entered the ship looking for the unknown man, but they didn't show him any picture of Antonio Anglés.
    It was a few days later when British police told the crew of the ship that the unknown man who kept hideingas a stowaway likely was Antonio Anglés, but British police apparently didn't show them any picture of Antonio Anglés either, which is weird at that time he may be included in the Interpol's most wanted list.
    So, the captain told the first time he saw a picture of Antonio Anglés was once the Spaniard journalist showed him so 25 years later!

    Even so, I would say the captain should have been curious for a search some info on the internet about Antonio Anglés, then by the first search he would have been able to see his picture by himself, but he didn't.
    Then, gilding the lily, the captain was interviewed by another Spaniard journalist in 2002, (just Levante newspaper), and at that time he eventually saw some pictures of Antonio Anglés, then he told none of those pictures fit with the physical appearance of Antonio Anglés.,
    We don't know if the captain is not able to remember properly, but sounds at least quite strange.
    This is the interview done in 2002 in Spanish language:
    http://elpalleter.orgfree.com/lemvfuga1.htm


    All the five facts posted above are new ones, so all of them make everything more complicated and make the official story of this crime even less trustworthy than ever.
    Last edited by overdrive1979; 05-04-2021 at 01:12 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •